On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 06:10:40PM +0100, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Got an idea...
> >
> > It helps if the process is started with the ADDR_COMPAT_LAYOUT personality
> > flag set.
>
> We should still be reserving the high memory area, so it shou
Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Got an idea...
>
> It helps if the process is started with the ADDR_COMPAT_LAYOUT personality
> flag set.
We should still be reserving the high memory area, so it shouldn't
make any difference WRT ulimits. Something else must be going on here.
--
Al
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 02:12:46PM +0100, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having a problem with virtual ulimits/rlimits.
>
> If you limit the virtual memory size using "ulimit -v 140" for
> instance, wine will only crash.
>
> The problem is, that VIRTUAL_alloc_teb() tries to allocate a
Marcus Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you limit the virtual memory size using "ulimit -v 140" for
> instance, wine will only crash.
>
> The problem is, that VIRTUAL_alloc_teb() tries to allocate a memory
> area within the acceptable userspace ... but it does so much mmap()s
> that i
Hi,
I am having a problem with virtual ulimits/rlimits.
If you limit the virtual memory size using "ulimit -v 140" for
instance, wine will only crash.
The problem is, that VIRTUAL_alloc_teb() tries to allocate a memory
area within the acceptable userspace ... but it does so much mmap()s
that
