On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Kai Blin wrote:
>> >> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
>
> You can see that the userAgent string contains (Kubuntu)...
Oh, right, thanks. I've added a lower-case ubuntu to the list,
can you try again? (The search should be case-
insensitive, but I h
On Sunday 22 February 2009 15:51:31 Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Kai Blin wrote:
> >> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> >
> > Konqueror 3.5 on an unknown distribution Linux an unknown CPU!
> > userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.5; Linux) KHTML/3.5.10
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 4:45 AM, Kai Blin wrote:
>> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
>
> Konqueror 3.5 on an unknown distribution Linux an unknown CPU!
> userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; Konqueror/3.5; Linux) KHTML/3.5.10 (like
> Gecko) (Kubuntu)
Yeah, that's https://bugs.launchpad.
> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
> put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table?
>
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'll fix it up as needed.
>
> I'm kind of excited about this
Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:24:09 -0800
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>
>> Can we add in a line at the top saying
>> "Stable version 1.0.1 of Wine can usually be installed
>> just like any other Linux application using your
>> package manager (e.g. in Ubuntu, do Applications / Add/Remo
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Remco wrote:
> Filed a bug with "epiphany-browser":
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/epiphany-browser/+bug/332253
Thanks. I filed one for Konqueror,
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdebase/+bug/332340
-Dan
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:02:16PM +0100, Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html and let me know if it
> > detects your distro properly, I'll fix it up as needed.You're running
>
> Firefox 3 on an unknown dis
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html and let me know if it
> detects your distro properly, I'll fix it up as needed.You're running
Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Windows an unknown CPU!
Firefox 3.0.6 on Windows XP SP3
userAgent
2009/2/21 Dan Kegel :
> Can we add in a line at the top saying
> "Stable version 1.0.1 of Wine can usually be installed
> just like any other Linux application using your
> package manager (e.g. in Ubuntu, do Applications / Add/Remove,
> select Wine, and click Apply Changes).
I know some versio
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Remco wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Remco wrote:
> > Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Linux!
> >
> > userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en; rv:1.9.0.6)
> > Gecko/20080528 Epiphany/2.22 Firefox/3.0
> >
> > I don't think you're gonna be ab
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Remco wrote:
> Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Linux!
>
> userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en; rv:1.9.0.6)
> Gecko/20080528 Epiphany/2.22 Firefox/3.0
>
> I don't think you're gonna be able to get the distribution name out of
> that... a problem wit
>> Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Linux!
>>
>> userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en; rv:1.9.0.6)
>> Gecko/20080528 Epiphany/2.22 Firefox/3.0
>>
>> I don't think you're gonna be able to get the distribution name out of
>> that... a problem with Epiphany I guess.
Right, same with Ko
And now also to the list:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:32 PM, Remco wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>>
>> Please try again, and paste the entire output page, I've added more info.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>
> Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Linux!
>
> userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Remco wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> > and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> > I'll fix it up as needed.
>
> It's probably a more useful test if you also print the repo
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'll fix it up as needed.
It's probably a more useful test if you also print the reported user
agent string. (By the way, Dan, could you somehow
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'll fix it up as needed.
You're running
Firefox 3 on an unknown distribution Linux!
Actually: Epiphany 2.24.1 on Ubuntu 8.10 x86-64
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Erich Hoover wrote:
> You could use the HTTP_USER_AGENT environment variable to do a first-order
> attempt. That way for people with Javascript disabled there's at least a
> chance you'll detect their distribution.
Yeah, we could probably do it all in php instea
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:40:28 -0800
Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Jeremy White wrote:
> > I can see that it consumes vertical white space, and I
> > can get over myself. I remove my objection :-/.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javasc
Hi Dan,
Firefox 3.1b2 on OpenSolaris 2008.11 returns: 'unknown distribution of
an unknown OS'.
Cheers
Hark
Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Jeremy White wrote:
>> I can see that it consumes vertical white space, and I
>> can get over myself. I remove my objection :-/.
>
> Th
2009/2/20 Dan Kegel :
> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
> put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table?
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'll fix it up as needed.
You're runni
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Juan Lang wrote:
> >> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
> >> put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table?
> >
> > Can we also have a non-Javascript page, pleas
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Daniel Verkamp wrote:
>>> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
>>> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
>>
>> On Gentoo with www-client/mozilla-firefox (not mozilla-firefox-bin)
>> the pa
For me, it got Gentoo just fine.
using: www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.1_beta2-r1
"You're using Firefox 3.1 on Gentoo Linux!"
--Murph
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Daniel Verkamp wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> [...]
>> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Juan Lang wrote:
>> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
>> put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table?
>
> Can we also have a non-Javascript page, please? People with
> accessibility issues, and crufty old curmudge
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Daniel Verkamp wrote:
>> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
>> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
>
> On Gentoo with www-client/mozilla-firefox (not mozilla-firefox-bin)
> the page just detects "unknown distribution Linux".
Try it now..
> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
> put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table?
Can we also have a non-Javascript page, please? People with
accessibility issues, and crufty old curmudgeons like me who disable
Javascript by default, would apprec
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:40:28 -0800
Dan Kegel wrote:
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'll fix it up as needed.
It does not my detect distro version. Can that be done?
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
[...]
> Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
> put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table?
>
> Please try http://kegel.com/wine/distro.html
> and let me know if it detects your distro properly,
> I'l
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Jeremy White wrote:
> I can see that it consumes vertical white space, and I
> can get over myself. I remove my objection :-/.
Thanks!
Next idea: why don't we detect the user's distro via javascript, and
put a targeted link to the 'right' package above the table
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:47:16AM -0600, Rosanne DiMesio wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:24:09 -0800
> Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> >
> > Can we add in a line at the top saying
> > "Stable version 1.0.1 of Wine can usually be installed
> > just like any other Linux application using your
> > package
> No argument there, but the thing you want prominently placed is the
> download link, not the thankyou, right?
Oh, sorry; I didn't understand.
I was trying to be honorable on this point by clearly revealing why
that prominent placement was given to us; a truth in advertising
sort of thing.
I ca
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Jeremy White wrote:
>>> I think we should also move the text
>>> "This endorsement is the primary recognition that CodeWeavers has
>>> requested in exchange for hosting the Wine web site."
>>> to the bottom of the page, and change it to read
>>> "Thanks to CodeWeav
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:24:09 -0800
Dan Kegel wrote:
>
> Can we add in a line at the top saying
> "Stable version 1.0.1 of Wine can usually be installed
> just like any other Linux application using your
> package manager (e.g. in Ubuntu, do Applications / Add/Remove,
> select Wine, and click
>> I think we should also move the text
>> "This endorsement is the primary recognition that CodeWeavers has
>> requested in exchange for hosting the Wine web site."
>> to the bottom of the page, and change it to read
>> "Thanks to CodeWeavers for hosting WineHQ.org".
>
> +1
To be very honest, th
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:37 AM, James Mckenzie
wrote:
> Austin English wrote:
>>Sent: Feb 20, 2009 10:32 AM
>>To: Dan Kegel
>>Cc: "wine-devel@winehq.org"
>>Subject: Re: Wine download page usability problem
>>
>>On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:24 A
Austin English wrote:
>Sent: Feb 20, 2009 10:32 AM
>To: Dan Kegel
>Cc: "wine-devel@winehq.org"
>Subject: Re: Wine download page usability problem
>
>On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
>>
>> Can we add in a line at the top saying
>>
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> I got email from a friend who complained how
> hard it was to install wine. Turns out he
> assumed he had to go to winehq.org and
> follow the download instructions there,
> when all he needed to do was do
> Applications / Add/Remove and pick W
37 matches
Mail list logo
