> In that case, what is "winedbg --gdb" for? Why have this option if no
GDB supports it?
because it targets different stuff:
winedbg (standalone) is able to load and use debug info from:
- ELF modules (exec and shared libs) (with stabs info, dwarf2 isn't supported).
As wine DLLs are implemented o
Eric Pouech wrote:
Could you give any hints as to how to configure GDB with 'stabs in
PE' support? The only reference I could find in the GDB documentation
is:
"6.4.5 PE
Windows 95 and NT use the PE (/Portable Executable/) format for their
executables. PE is basically COFF with additional heade
Bryce McKinlay a écrit :
Eric Pouech wrote:
Bryce McKinlay a écrit :
I'm trying to debug a windows .exe built with mingw using wine, but
winedbg seems to have problems reading stabs from the mingw-built
binary. My goal is to be able to debug a cross-compiled, native Java
(GCJ) application, but e
Eric Pouech wrote:
Bryce McKinlay a écrit :
I'm trying to debug a windows .exe built with mingw using wine, but
winedbg seems to have problems reading stabs from the mingw-built
binary. My goal is to be able to debug a cross-compiled, native Java
(GCJ) application, but even a simple C "hello wor
Dimitrie O. Paun a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 11:35:07AM +0100, Eric Pouech wrote:
winedbg using the gdb won't work here because (likely on unix) gdb isn't
compiled with proper 'stabs in PE' support
Maybe we should lobby people (like Fedora) to enable it by default.
but this would require
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 11:35:07AM +0100, Eric Pouech wrote:
> winedbg using the gdb won't work here because (likely on unix) gdb isn't
> compiled with proper 'stabs in PE' support
Maybe we should lobby people (like Fedora) to enable it by default.
--
Dimi.
Bryce McKinlay a écrit :
I'm trying to debug a windows .exe built with mingw using wine, but
winedbg seems to have problems reading stabs from the mingw-built
binary. My goal is to be able to debug a cross-compiled, native Java
(GCJ) application, but even a simple C "hello world" seems to cause
Scott Ritchie wrote:
On Sat, 2005-01-01 at 18:04 -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
On Sat, 2005-01-01 at 17:53 -0500, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
I've attached the mingw-compiled C binary. Is it worth trying again with
a newwer WINE? Thanks!
Wait, I need to correct myself:
NOT ALWAYS.
There was
On Sat, 2005-01-01 at 18:04 -0800, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-01-01 at 17:53 -0500, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> > I've attached the mingw-compiled C binary. Is it worth trying again with
> > a newwer WINE? Thanks!
> >
>
> Always!
>
> -Scott Ritchie
Wait, I need to correct myself:
NOT AL
On Sat, 2005-01-01 at 17:53 -0500, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
> WINE is wine-0.20040914-1.rhfc2.nr from newrpms.sunsite.dk
Did you try the newer rpms on Wine's download page? One was probably
built for the same setup you're using.
> I've attached the mingw-compiled C binary. Is it worth trying agai
10 matches
Mail list logo