On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Jonathan Ernst wrote:
[...]
About the new AppDB Application Status Changes, I see that you have a
change column.
I'm not convinced this column is of any use: it only repeats what we see
in the other two columns but in a less obvious way.
The total / global trend however
Hello,
First, thank you for your work on the WWN !
About the new AppDB Application Status Changes, I see that you have a
change column. What do you think about adding the sum of this column
somewhere so we can see how/if Wine is improving between releases
regarding application compatibility (of
I thought about it, but wasn't sure of the usefulness of such a
number. If consensus is that it would be worth having, i'll add it
for WWN 335.
On Dec 10, 2007 3:57 PM, Jonathan Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
First, thank you for your work on the WWN !
About the new AppDB Application
Zachary Goldberg wrote:
I thought about it, but wasn't sure of the usefulness of such a
number. If consensus is that it would be worth having, i'll add it
for WWN 335.
On Dec 10, 2007 3:57 PM, Jonathan Ernst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
First, thank you for your work on the WWN !
All good points (from a fellow Norwegian :)
On the other hand, appDB entries are (and probably always will be) user
generated content, and users will always have different opinions (and
environment setup).
IMHO users won't sue wine if the abbDB status differs from their
experience with an
On Wednesday 05 December 2007 16:08:27 Zachary Goldberg wrote:
Hmmm interesting idea. I don't actually know just yet who the
maintainer of the AppDB is, but he/she may respond in this thread
(I'll attempt to find out their email anyway) as to whether or not its
possible to generate a weekly
On Dec 5, 2007 8:20 AM, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Their e-mail is [EMAIL PROTECTED] They'll have to decide how to track the
changes, but in any case the code should be in soon.
What about downgrades? Regressions happen. It'd be terrible one week
to promise
Brian,
Yep -- i'll be tracking downgrades too. I'm actually writing the code
myself, you'll likely see the results in next weeks issue
--Zach
On Dec 5, 2007 3:30 PM, Brian Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 5, 2007 8:20 AM, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Their
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Possibly, but on the other hand it could just as easily become Garbage
in the next release of Wine ;)
(sorry, I already sent this once at the start of the day but emailed it
directly to the previous person rather than back to the list)
Ben H.
Tomas
I've finished coding a script which runs the necessary query to
generate data (I download a database backup and run the queries on my
local machine.). As a sampling (if anybody feels like tripple
checking that the data is correct) of Upgrades (and some downgrades)
from 11-27-2007 to 12-04-2007:
Hmmm interesting idea. I don't actually know just yet who the
maintainer of the AppDB is, but he/she may respond in this thread
(I'll attempt to find out their email anyway) as to whether or not its
possible to generate a weekly summary of applications which have been
upgraded through the week?
The problem of using test results as background for this is that they are very
dependent on the experience of each user. For instance some might be unable
to run a game because they have execshield or other stuff that mess up Wine,
or simply because they are not following the how-to
This is great :)
Would it be a good idea to include major news from the appDB?
Ex: Photoshop cs2 has now reached Gold status
I think this would be very inspiring to users.
Tomas
Triton wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 18:23:10 -0500
Zachary Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kai,
It was my
On Thursday 06 December 2007 00:44:03 Zachary Goldberg wrote:
Here are the updated results for when we only look at updates from App
Maintainers. It also just so happens that that age of empires case
you mentioned is in fact by a maintainer. Please respond and leave
your opinion as to which
Here are the updated results for when we only look at updates from App
Maintainers. It also just so happens that that age of empires case
you mentioned is in fact by a maintainer. Please respond and leave
your opinion as to which is more worthwhile in the WWN. Perhaps i'll
put both in different
Do you feel apps get updated enough that there are enough instances of
an app being reviewed more than once per release to change these
results?
On Dec 5, 2007 6:52 PM, Alexander Nicolaysen Sørnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 06 December 2007 00:44:03 Zachary Goldberg wrote:
Here are
i'd argue that this means we need to be smarter about how we process
the test results. We need both a confidence and a rating and some way
to reflect this in the results.
Your other point about configuration, if users have problems with
configuration then while it may be their fault its not
Kai,
It was my pleasure :). Keep the interesting wine discussion/news
coming and I'll keep writing WWNs. I'll also make note to highlight
in particular GSoC developments as they happen.
--Zach
On Dec 4, 2007 6:14 PM, Kai Blin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Zach,
thanks for getting a new WWN
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 18:23:10 -0500
Zachary Goldberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kai,
It was my pleasure :). Keep the interesting wine discussion/news
coming and I'll keep writing WWNs. I'll also make note to highlight
in particular GSoC developments as they happen.
--Zach
Hi everyone,
19 matches
Mail list logo
