On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> My guess is that ldconfig has messed with the symlinks.
Maybe because I have the old libwine*.so.1.0 in there...
I'll get rid of them, sorry for the false alarm.
--
Dimi.
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, I did a standard build:
>
> configure --with-nptl --silent && make -s depend && make -s
>
> than installed it (as root):
>
> make -s install
My guess is that ldconfig has messed with the symlinks.
--
Alexandre Julliard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Yes, and it seems to work fine here. Could you show us the exact
> commands you ran and the relevant make output?
Well, I did a standard build:
configure --with-nptl --silent && make -s depend && make -s
than installed it (as root):
make -s
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That is to say, both libwine.so and libwine_unicode.so are fubared.
> They point to old libs. Shouldn't they just point to the .1 versions?
Yes, and it seems to work fine here. Could you show us the exact
commands you ran and the relevant make outp
