On 27.05.2004 04:09:34 Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Stefan Leichter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > before removing the acsii calls from GetAcceptLanguagesW, i like to see
> the
> > results of the attached tests. This will hopefuly save me some work when
> > rewriting the function. The tests pas
> Its not a fault of the tests that they fail on wine, its a fault of > wine. For my understanding the test are created to show that either the > behaviour of wine is correct (when the test succeeds) or that something > left to do one wine (when a test fails)!?
check out the todo_wine construct in
On Thu, 27 May 2004 12:17:15 +0200, Stefan Leichter wrote:
> Its not a fault of the tests that they fail on wine, its a fault of
> wine. For my understanding the test are created to show that either the
> behaviour of wine is correct (when the test succeeds) or that something
> left to do one wi
"Stefan Leichter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its not a fault of the tests that they fail on wine, its a fault of
> wine. For my understanding the test are created to show that either the
> behaviour of wine is correct (when the test succeeds) or that something
> left to do one wine (when a te
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Stefan Leichter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
before removing the acsii calls from GetAcceptLanguagesW, i like to see the
results of the attached tests. This will hopefuly save me some work when
rewriting the function. The tests passes on my Win2k system.
But they
Stefan Leichter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> before removing the acsii calls from GetAcceptLanguagesW, i like to see the
> results of the attached tests. This will hopefuly save me some work when
> rewriting the function. The tests passes on my Win2k system.
But they fail on Wine, so I can't a
