Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
On a related note - I haven't been able to get an answer to that one,
not even through experimentation. Does anyone know whether Windows'
Unicode is UTF-16 or UCS-2? Whether it's necessary to handle aggregates
is crucially important when reordering characters.
Hi Maarten,
Can you, please, explain the advantage of creating our own
implementation of the BiDi algorithm over using existing
implementations? I know ICU sucks (especially as far as linkage is
concerned), but there are other implementations, major among which is
fribidi, which are free, are C
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Maarten,
Can you, please, explain the advantage of creating our own
implementation of the BiDi algorithm over using existing
implementations? I know ICU sucks (especially as far as linkage is
concerned), but there are other implementations, major
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Actually the proper place would be libwine along with the rest of the
Unicode support.
I've spent the past hour downloading 12% of the git repository, so I'm
unable to look at current Wine code for at least the next 24 hours :-(.
From memory, libwine contains
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Actually the proper place would be libwine along with the rest of the
Unicode support.
I've spent the past hour downloading 12% of the git repository, so I'm
unable to look at current Wine code for at least the next 24 hours :-(.
From memory, libwine contains
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've spent the past hour downloading 12% of the git repository, so I'm
unable to look at current Wine code for at least the next 24 hours
:-(.
You can always browse the code at http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git
From memory, libwine contains
Shachar Shemesh schreef:
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Actually the proper place would be libwine along with the rest of the
Unicode support.
I've spent the past hour downloading 12% of the git repository, so I'm
unable to look at current Wine code for at least the next 24 hours
