On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Alexander Morozov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Conformance tests should consist of a driver and a program to load
> it. I do not know other method to call functions from ntoskrnl.exe and
> usbd.sys on Windows. But I have a problem with building drivers with MinGW. I
> Yes, add conformance tests for the new ntoskrnl functions
> and usbd.sys, and break the patch up a lot...
Conformance tests should consist of a driver and a program to load
it. I do not know other method to call functions from ntoskrnl.exe and
usbd.sys on Windows. But I have a problem with bui
> I think should split my patch into many little commits.
> Should also add some tests or make some changes?
Yes, add conformance tests for the new ntoskrnl functions
and usbd.sys, and break the patch up a lot...
Looks like people have been hoping for something like
this for a couple years now,
> Split it at least into the sub driver/dll parts.
>
> You can leave out the "configure" part, it will be regenerated form
> configure. ac anyway. Same for dlls/Makefile.in
>
> The ntoskrnl changes might break the already working copy protection
> drivers, so either try them yourself after the patc
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 12:10:17PM +0400, Alexander Morozov wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I created a patch which adds support of USB hardware tokens with native
> Windows drivers (.sys):
> ftp://ftp.etersoft.ru/pub/download/amorozov/0001-Support-of-native-Windows-drivers-for-USB-t
Hello All,
I created a patch which adds support of USB hardware tokens with native
Windows drivers (.sys):
ftp://ftp.etersoft.ru/pub/download/amorozov/0001-Support-of-native-Windows-drivers-for-USB-tokens.txt
Now SafeNet UltraPro (driver sntnlusb.sys, vid/pid 04b9:0300) and Eutron
SmartKey 3
