On 11/13/2010 10:59 AM, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
When I run both tests as single files from a "make crosstest"
I was not able to reproduce neither the explorer crash or the explorer
windows not opening.
I didn't see a crash but maybe this is because I'm testing on W2K. I can
still reliably ge
Am Donnerstag 11 November 2010 schrieben Sie:
> On 11/06/2010 11:16 AM, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
> > Hello,
> > this patch checks for correct arrival of messages to a subclassed property
> > page.
> >
> > For this bug http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12104 specifically
> > the first WM_SIZE
On 11/06/2010 11:16 AM, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
Hello,
this patch checks for correct arrival of messages to a subclassed property page.
For this bug http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12104 specifically
the first WM_SIZE message is interesting which is not sent in wine.
I have changed the
On 10/24/2010 05:20 AM, Bernhard Übelacker wrote:
If I got it right, tests which would fail in wine are prefixed with todo_wine?
I want to ask if this patch looks right for inclusion and if the
location (dlls/comctl32/tests/) is right?
+/* disabled because todo_wine would fail because
Hello,
the attached patch consists of a test case for following bug:
http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12104
This test shows how cygwin's setup checks if a WM_SIZE message
was received (by the custom window proc).
In wine only the property page gets such a message - not the sheet.
If I got
