On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:51 AM, James Mckenzie
wrote:
>>> Why do we have versions on Mac OS X? How about we combine them all?
>>
>>It can make a big difference in the bug. The X.org version in OS X
>>(partially?) depends on what OS X version you have. ...
>
> As far as OS/2 goes, it is still a
On May 29, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Austin English wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov
wrote:
"Austin English" wrote:
Why do we have versions on Mac OS X? How about we combine them all?
It can make a big difference in the bug. The X.org version in OS X
(partially?) depends
>
>> Why do we have versions on Mac OS X? How about we combine them all?
>
>It can make a big difference in the bug. The X.org version in OS X
>(partially?) depends on what OS X version you have. Some bugs will
>only show up in Tiger, because Leopard has them fixed on Apple's end.
>(Someone corre
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov
wrote:
> "Austin English" wrote:
>
>>> Why do we have versions on Mac OS X? How about we combine them all?
>>
>> It can make a big difference in the bug. The X.org version in OS X
>> (partially?) depends on what OS X version you have. Some bugs w
"Austin English" wrote:
Why do we have versions on Mac OS X? How about we combine them all?
It can make a big difference in the bug. The X.org version in OS X
(partially?) depends on what OS X version you have. Some bugs will
only show up in Tiger, because Leopard has them fixed on Apple's en
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Juan Lang wrote:
>>> I don't suppose you've changed your mind on also removing the obsolete
>>> OS's (BSDI, AIX, IRIX, HP-UX, SunOS, OS/2, Mac OS X < 10.3)?
>>
>> Did he say he wasn't for it? I didn't catch tha
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Juan Lang wrote:
>> I don't suppose you've changed your mind on also removing the obsolete
>> OS's (BSDI, AIX, IRIX, HP-UX, SunOS, OS/2, Mac OS X < 10.3)?
>
> Did he say he wasn't for it? I didn't catch that. Dan, here's a vote
> for removing those. I can't comm
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Juan Lang wrote:
>> I don't suppose you've changed your mind on also removing the obsolete
>> OS's (BSDI, AIX, IRIX, HP-UX, SunOS, OS/2, Mac OS X < 10.3)?
>
> Did he say he wasn't for it? I didn't catch that. Dan, here's a vote
> for removing those. I can't com
> I don't suppose you've changed your mind on also removing the obsolete
> OS's (BSDI, AIX, IRIX, HP-UX, SunOS, OS/2, Mac OS X < 10.3)?
Did he say he wasn't for it? I didn't catch that. Dan, here's a vote
for removing those. I can't comment on all of them, but SunOS has
been obsolete for a deca
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Juan Lang wrote:
>> The only use of these platforms was three mistaken
>> bug reports that probably wanted PC. I don't see
>> any reason to keep these old system types around
>> any more.
>> OK to remove?
>> (Suggested in http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
> The only use of these platforms was three mistaken
> bug reports that probably wanted PC. I don't see
> any reason to keep these old system types around
> any more.
> OK to remove?
> (Suggested in http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13363 )
Please.
--Juan
The only use of these platforms was three mistaken
bug reports that probably wanted PC. I don't see
any reason to keep these old system types around
any more.
OK to remove?
(Suggested in http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13363 )
12 matches
Mail list logo
