On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Michael Ost wrote:
[...]
Thanks. I suspected that was the way to go. Should the TlsAlloc code, or
perhaps the thread init code, check on the windows emulation version and
allow the right number of slots... 64, 80 or 1088?
We try not to make the implementation depend on the emul
On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 03:30, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Michael Ost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > With the emulation mode set to "winxp" I can only TlsAlloc 64 indexes,
> > even though the MSDN docs say there should be at least 20 million.
> >
> > http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.as
Michael Ost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With the emulation mode set to "winxp" I can only TlsAlloc 64 indexes,
> even though the MSDN docs say there should be at least 20 million.
>
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dllproc/base/thread_local_storage.asp
>
> Has
Hi Michael,
> With the emulation mode set to "winxp" I can only TlsAlloc 64
> indexes, even though the MSDN docs say there should be at least
> 20 million.
You're misreading that page, the limits are:
Win 2000/2003 & XP - 1088 indexes per process
Win Me/98 - 80 indexes per process
Win NT
With the emulation mode set to "winxp" I can only TlsAlloc 64 indexes,
even though the MSDN docs say there should be at least 20 million.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dllproc/base/thread_local_storage.asp
Has anyone done any work on this? Any workaround/hackaro
