--On Saturday, June 18, 2005 8:31 AM -0400 Brad DeMorrow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Samba already uses something called 'TDB', and it's been suggested that
the two projects could share a case-insensitive-filename layer based on
it; could you look into using that?
I've not heard of t
David Lee Lambert wrote:
On Thursday 16 June 2005 11:20 pm, you wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 22:22:56 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Actually the current method is probably the fastest for everything
except the initial read.
The only reason that the current method is fast is be
On Thursday 16 June 2005 11:20 pm, you wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 22:22:56 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > Actually the current method is probably the fastest for everything
> > except the initial read.
>
> The only reason that the current method is fast is because we're loading
> the entire
area. But it might
be worth it.
James
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 08:08 +0200, Martin Fuchs wrote:
2005/6/19, James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Brad,
I've been following you discussion about wine's registry format, and I
find it interesting. I gave it some thought, I have h
worth it.
James
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 08:08 +0200, Martin Fuchs wrote:
> 2005/6/19, James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hi Brad,
> > I've been following you discussion about wine's registry format, and I
> > find it interesting. I gave it some thought, I hav
2005/6/19, James Liggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Brad,
> I've been following you discussion about wine's registry format, and I
> find it interesting. I gave it some thought, I have have an idea. Have
> you thought about using XML as a potential format? Since the re
James Liggett wrote:
Hi Brad,
I've been following you discussion about wine's registry format, and I
find it interesting. I gave it some thought, I have have an idea. Have
you thought about using XML as a potential format? Since the registry is
a non-relational tree database, this se
Hi Brad,
I've been following you discussion about wine's registry format, and I
find it interesting. I gave it some thought, I have have an idea. Have
you thought about using XML as a potential format? Since the registry is
a non-relational tree database, this seems to fit quite
On Sat, 18 Jun 2005 22:22:56 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Actually the current method is probably the fastest for everything
> except the initial read.
The only reason that the current method is fast is because we're loading
the entire registry into memory. As stated in Bugzilla, this is
Brad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's a bug on bugzilla (422) that asks for the registry file format to
> be re-written in order to be able to dynamically load parts of the
> registry. If you don't feel like looking it up - don't worry, I'm going
> to explain why this would benefit wine. . .
There's a bug on bugzilla (422) that asks for the registry file format to
be re-written in order to be able to dynamically load parts of the
registry. If you don't feel like looking it up - don't worry, I'm going
to explain why this would benefit wine. . .
It's said that wine loads the entire reg
11 matches
Mail list logo
