"Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm not sure you can do the ELF magic with a static library, but even if
>> you could there's a lot more to the initial setup than the preloader;
>> that's why winelib apps are shared libraries, so that w
Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure you can do the ELF magic with a static library, but even if
> you could there's a lot more to the initial setup than the preloader;
> that's why winelib apps are shared libraries, so that we can do all the
> work that needs to be done
"Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The scenario I'm imagining is:
> Lots of people want to use a particular windows dll in their Linux apps.
> Joe Developer writes a nice wrapper library using winelib to hide
> the fact that win32 is involved at all.
> Fred Developer uses Joe's library
Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Because getting rid of it might make it much easier
> > to turn winelib into a normal library, thus enabling
> > plain old linux apps to at least statically link it in
> > and thereby become able to use windows dlls
> > without having to use the
"Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Because getting rid of it might make it much easier
> to turn winelib into a normal library, thus enabling
> plain old linux apps to at least statically link it in
> and thereby become able to use windows dlls
> without having to use the preloader.
We cou
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 1:24 AM, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2255
> > If that kernel issue were resolved, would that let us get
> > rid of the preloader?
>
> Why would you want to get rid of it? We haven't had any trouble with it f
Stefan Dösinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Dienstag, 4. März 2008 10:24:25 schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
>> "Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Say, it looks like at some point in the past, an alternate
>> > approach was looked at for reserving special addresses:
>> > http://bugzilla.
Am Dienstag, 4. März 2008 10:24:25 schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
> "Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Say, it looks like at some point in the past, an alternate
> > approach was looked at for reserving special addresses:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2255
> > If that kernel
"Dan Kegel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Say, it looks like at some point in the past, an alternate
> approach was looked at for reserving special addresses:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2255
> If that kernel issue were resolved, would that let us get
> rid of the preloader?
Not
Say, it looks like at some point in the past, an alternate
approach was looked at for reserving special addresses:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2255
If that kernel issue were resolved, would that let us get
rid of the preloader?
10 matches
Mail list logo
