Re: Wineconf update, RFC re remote participation

2004-01-08 Thread Brian Vincent (C)
Title: Re: Wineconf update, RFC re remote participation > p.s.  If someone out there is thinking:  of course you could do that, > if would be trivial if you just did 'X', please feel free to share X > with me.  Otherwise, we'll have to investigate the open pbx proje

Re: Wineconf update, RFC re remote participation

2004-01-08 Thread Eric Pouech
Dimitrie O. Paun a écrit : On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Eric Pouech wrote: One of the things which improved was to have a couple of folks present chatting on IRC at the same time (even, if it was not satisfactory to break in and ask questions) Telephone conversations are quite cheap nowadays (from Eur

Re: Wineconf update, RFC re remote participation

2004-01-08 Thread Jeremy White
> I remember getting all sorts of spam about very cheap conference calling. > It can't be that expensive, we just set up a US number, the caller > pays the long distance charges (which are very small right now)... Well, we've had a tentative offer from someone to use their conference services; I'l

Re: Wineconf update, RFC re remote participation

2004-01-08 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On January 7, 2004 08:46 pm, Jeremy White wrote: > p.s. If someone out there is thinking: of course you could do that, > if would be trivial if you just did 'X', please feel free to share X > with me. Otherwise, we'll have to investigate the open pbx project > and the possibility of getting some

Re: Wineconf update, RFC re remote participation

2004-01-07 Thread Jeremy White
Telephone conversations are quite cheap nowadays (from Europe, they cost are <$3/h!), what about a big conference call. You can break in, ask questions, etc... That will work quite nicely with any sort of telecast from the conference, me thinks. That's an interesting idea; it's conceivable that we

Re: Wineconf update, RFC re remote participation

2004-01-07 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Eric Pouech wrote: > One of the things which improved was to have a couple of folks present > chatting on IRC at the same time (even, if it was not satisfactory to > break in and ask questions) Telephone conversations are quite cheap nowadays (from Europe, they cost are <$3/

Re: Wineconf update, RFC re remote participation

2004-01-07 Thread Eric Pouech
Does anyone recall being remote to the last Wineconf? Yes I was (and I'll be remote again this year) Video is of course better than audio (and you can also store it for later reuse) Did it work at all? Yes, as a feed back for presentation Is there anything we could/should do to enable others

Re: Wineconf update, RFC re remote participation

2004-01-07 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote: One thing I would like to do is to stream audio This would be a regression, the last wineconf had a video stream. Ivan. Do you have the date for the previous wineconf? I can try and find the patch that broke it :-) -- Shachar Shemesh Lingnu Open Systems Cons

Re: Wineconf update, RFC re remote participation

2004-01-07 Thread Ivan Leo Murray-Smith
> One thing I would like to do is to stream audio This would be a regression, the last wineconf had a video stream. Ivan.

Wineconf update, RFC re remote participation

2004-01-06 Thread Jeremy White
Hi folks, Okay, I've updated the Wineconf page: http://www.winehq.org/wineconf/ One thing I would like to do is to stream audio from the conference out to the web and also work very hard to include folks from #winehq (or maybe #wineconf) in some of the sessions. The sessions I thought made pa