Re: Winetest: outstanding issues (BUILDING)

2004-04-23 Thread Paul Millar
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Kevin Koltzau wrote: If we are always explicitly using EST, daylight savings will never affect it (its always UTC-5) as when in daylight savings, the timezone changes to EDT (which is UTC-4) Please, could we all agree to use UTC? It is *the* universal timezone.

Re: Winetest: outstanding issues (BUILDING)

2004-04-23 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On April 23, 2004 7:52 am, Paul Millar wrote: Please, could we all agree to use UTC?  It is *the* universal timezone.   Expressing time in any other tz always introduces the possibility of confusion. Paul, sorry but there's no confusion. Let's not go back on that, *that* would cause confusion.

Re: Winetest: outstanding issues (BUILDING)

2004-04-23 Thread Brian Vincent
As it was written in the Book of Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED]: B. Naming program-build-publisher-tools[-misc].ext Good. C. Publishing After the files have been successfully uploaded to the server (for winetest, this will be sf.net), a publish event

Re: Winetest: outstanding issues (BUILDING)

2004-04-22 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
From: Paul Millar [EMAIL PROTECTED] One way this could work is if the general format for the BUILD_ID is MMDDhhmm [ - tag [ - tag ] ...] where tag is any metadata keyword that must not include a - Right, I have reached the exact same conclusion over lunch myself. So here is a fresh

Re: Winetest: outstanding issues (BUILDING)

2004-04-22 Thread Kevin Koltzau
- the build will use same time converted to UTC so it will mosty be MMDD1000, but it may be different when daylight-savings is in effect If we are always explicitly using EST, daylight savings will never affect it (its always UTC-5) as when in daylight savings, the