Re: Yeah - our RichEDit needs some work

2006-02-01 Thread Dan Kegel
On Dec 25 2003, Subhobroto Sinha wrote: > IMHO, one of the best tests are Steve Gibson's > (http://www.grc.com) freeware tools - this guy writes in pure ASM. > and thus we can be sure that his code will be the least messy (lesser MS > stuff..) > However, if you try his 'Wizmo' or 'DCOMObulator', >

Re[4]: Yeah - our RichEDit needs some work

2003-12-29 Thread Phil Krylov
Hello Dimitrie, Monday, December 29, 2003, 11:33:21 PM, you wrote: DOP> Now, if you are familiar with the richedit problem, DOP> can you come up with a list of tasks that will eventually DOP> lead to a full blown richedit control? It is a big task, if DOP> we break it into smaller, self contained

Re: Re[2]: Yeah - our RichEDit needs some work

2003-12-29 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
> I have to note that richedit should also implement Text > Object Model, that is, > ITextDocument, ITextServices etc. > (and to be really compatible with M$ one, it should be > based on them). Indeed. Now, if you are familiar with the richedit problem, can you come up with a list of tasks that

Re[4]: Yeah - our RichEDit needs some work

2003-12-29 Thread Saulius Krasuckas
ughm.. sorry -one year ago i decided i would contribute in RTF/RichEd are to Wine. +one year ago i decided i would contribute in RTF/RichEd area to Wine.

Re[3]: Yeah - our RichEDit needs some work

2003-12-29 Thread Saulius Krasuckas
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Phil Krylov wrote: > JW> http://www.nllgg.nl/Ted/ > > JW> I would toss it in myself, but I suck a coding. I > JW> wouldn't even know where to begin. > > I have to note that richedit should also implement Text Object Model, > that is, ITextDocument, ITextServices etc. (and to b

Re[2]: Yeah - our RichEDit needs some work

2003-12-29 Thread Phil Krylov
Hello Joshua, Thursday, December 25, 2003, 11:04:28 PM, you wrote: JW> If you need the source of a program that can uses RTF JW> as it's native format, can spit out JW> microsoft-compatible RTF files, has all the tools for JW> editing Rick Text, and the source is aviliable in C... JW> then use th

Re: Yeah - our RichEDit needs some work

2003-12-29 Thread Dimitrie O. Paun
On December 25, 2003 03:04 pm, Joshua Walker wrote: > If you need the source of a program that can uses RTF > as it's native format, can spit out > microsoft-compatible RTF files, has all the tools for > editing Rick Text, and the source is aviliable in C... > then use the Source for "Ted" Unfortu

Re: Yeah - our RichEDit needs some work

2003-12-25 Thread Dan Kegel
Subhobroto Sinha wrote: IMHO, one of the best tests are Steve Gibson's (www.grc.com) freeware tools - this guy writes in pure ASM. and thus we can be sure that his code will be the least messy (lesser MS stuff..) However, if you try his 'Wizmo' or 'DCOMObulator', you will see that the RichEdit tex

Re: Yeah - our RichEDit needs some work

2003-12-25 Thread Joshua Walker
If you need the source of a program that can uses RTF as it's native format, can spit out microsoft-compatible RTF files, has all the tools for editing Rick Text, and the source is aviliable in C... then use the Source for "Ted" http://www.nllgg.nl/Ted/ I would toss it in myself, but I suck a cod

Yeah - our RichEDit needs some work

2003-12-25 Thread Subhobroto Sinha
;) Actually, I noticed this many times before(text not displaying at all in a RichEdit control..) I am one of those (un)fortunate enough to not have a real Windows, and often download Win32 freeware to see how WINE's doing from time to time... IMHO, one of the best tests are Steve Gibson's (ww