On October 10, 2003 01:48 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > But if mailman can't do it, there would still be other ways to
> > organise this, only they would be uglier and trickier. Do we actually
> > know yet if someone at winehq will "let this happen"? A
Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But if mailman can't do it, there would still be other ways to organise
> this, only they would be uglier and trickier. Do we actually know yet if
> someone at winehq will "let this happen"? And likewise, would Alexandre
> (as the primary target of win
FWIW: I'm away soon for a few days, so you'll have to continue this
without me (a fact which is no doubt to your infinite relief :-).
On October 10, 2003 11:27 am, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
[snip]
> I haven't dispatched you to the archives to be rude, but
On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
> The submission and processing of patches is not something totally alien to
> me, though the specific history and conclusions reached w.r.t. wine mail
> lists is. That said, you needn't crusade the inlining argument by
> dispatching me to the list archi
On October 9, 2003 10:54 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On October 9, 2003 09:58 pm, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
> > look/feel/use, like "wine-cvs". I would have personally thought that
> > attachments make more sense, because separating patches from text can
> > be ambiguous and it's not as easy to send mu
On October 9, 2003 09:58 pm, Geoff Thorpe wrote:
> look/feel/use, like "wine-cvs". I would have personally thought that
> attachments make more sense, because separating patches from text can be
> ambiguous and it's not as easy to send multiple patches (eg. when
> submitting two alternative patches
Glad to hear someone is taking this up! :-)
As for the approach, I think if you do take the approach of letting
"unmatched" emails through, you should perhaps mangle the subject or
prepend some template text to the body of the email. Otherwise it's less
clear that someone will send a polite not
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> I don't think that's a good idea. I think "looks like text" is
> difficult. I don't know how Japanese resources look like, nor how
> Keyboard layouts in Spanish. I'd rather go with the file extension.
file(1) is your friend. Mime types are completely
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
I think I can do that. What I suggest:
Attachments must be either .diff or .patch. If you want, they can be bz2
or gz compressed. Mime type is disregarded. Also, the mail must be
non-HTML (or, at least, must have a text only
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> I think I can do that. What I suggest:
> Attachments must be either .diff or .patch. If you want, they can be bz2
> or gz compressed. Mime type is disregarded. Also, the mail must be
> non-HTML (or, at least, must have a text only component). Emails t
Geoff Thorpe wrote:
Couldn't the wine-patches list server simply pull the emails apart and
reconstruct them according to some simple rules? I'm no Perl hacker, but
I'm sure this could be stitched together easily by someone who is.
I think I can do that. What I suggest:
Attachments must be eit
On October 9, 2003 08:46 am, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On October 9, 2003 08:11 am, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
> > As an alternative, if welcome on the list, we can zip/bzip the
> > patch, this way they wont be mangled by Notes.
>
> No, this is most definitely not welcome on the list...
Couldn't th
On October 9, 2003 08:11 am, Sylvain Petreolle wrote:
> As an alternative, if welcome on the list, we can zip/bzip the patch,
> this way they wont be mangled by Notes.
No, this is most definitely not welcome on the list...
--
Dimi.
As an alternative, if welcome on the list, we can zip/bzip the patch,
this way they wont be mangled by Notes.
> >
> >
> Can't you just call your diffs "something.txt" and attach them?
>
=
Sylvain Petreolle (spetreolle_at_users_dot_sourceforge_dot_net)
ICQ #170597259
Say NO to software pa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dimi,
I'm deeply sorry about that and I understand your frustrations for
I have frustrations of my own using my mail client.
The problem is that I have no other choice but to use Notes as a mail
client for external emails at my company and Notes really screws up
attach
On October 8, 2003 05:51 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So what I'm gonna do in the future is inline patches that won't get
> line wrapped and attach the others the way I use too. Hopefully,
> most of them will be inlined.
Thanks Dave,
This is very kind of you, but I think this is too much effort
Hi Dimi,
I'm deeply sorry about that and I understand your frustrations for
I have frustrations of my own using my mail client.
The problem is that I have no other choice but to use Notes as a mail
client for external emails at my company and Notes really screws up
attachments and there's no w
17 matches
Mail list logo
