Hey Joerg,
Op 27-01-12 16:35, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com schreef:
Maarten,
thank you for participating!
Provide a hidden API in mmdevapi?
No need, you know how mmdevapi behaves, you can write it in such a
way without adding latency by using GetCurrentPadding or the clock.
I don't know
Maarten,
thank you for participating!
>> Provide a hidden API in mmdevapi?
>No need, you know how mmdevapi behaves, you can write it in such a
>way without adding latency by using GetCurrentPadding or the clock.
I don't know what you mean. What I mean is follows:
mmdevapi has no notion of rewin
Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>you know how mmdevapi behaves
>Just bite the bullet and add a winepulse driver already, I'll even fix
>mine to work better if it had a chance of getting accepted
I have no objection to a winepulse driver. Indeed we (not just me,
hopefully) now know a lot about how mmdev
Op 26-01-12 12:59, joerg-cyril.hoe...@t-systems.com schreef:
Hi,
What are the areas that would have the most impact if fixed?
You are invited to participate and share your thoughts.
I believe we need to distinguish winmm/dsound/mmdevapi/OS.
mmdevapi:
A. lock-less timer callback design, bug #.
Hi,
What are the areas that would have the most impact if fixed?
You are invited to participate and share your thoughts.
I believe we need to distinguish winmm/dsound/mmdevapi/OS.
mmdevapi:
A. lock-less timer callback design, bug #. But I don't think where we
would get the most improvement fr
