Re: building programs

Hi, On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:01:49PM +, Rob D wrote: > Thank you VERY much. I changed alot of things, including reinstalling > Debian to get rid of 3 different source installs, and some gcc tweaks I > had done before I learned muc about it, but I am sure the suggestions you > gave resulte

Re: building programs

Thank you VERY much. I changed alot of things, including reinstalling Debian to get rid of 3 different source installs, and some gcc tweaks I had done before I learned muc about it, but I am sure the suggestions you gave resulted in perfectly clean builds on Debian Sarge. After some tweaking of

Re: building programs

Le sam 05/03/2005 à 16:17, Rob D a écrit : > I have attached 2 Makefiles that give me the unresolved main error on > Solaris10. > > AEP Makefile is supposed to make an executable from a few files and some > libraries. Now I've had time to look at this one. I simplified it a bit (only kept ../ne

Re: building programs

Le sam 05/03/2005 à 16:17, Rob D a écrit : > I have attached 2 Makefiles that give me the unresolved main error on > Solaris10. > > AEP Makefile is supposed to make an executable from a few files and some > libraries. I've only looked at the netclient one for now, I'll get to the other one soon

Re: building programs

I have attached 2 Makefiles that give me the unresolved main error on Solaris10. AEP Makefile is supposed to make an executable from a few files and some libraries. Netclient is supposed to make a static lib, and it works good, but it complains about missing main also. Im not sure why I am hav

Re: building programs

Vincent Béron wrote: I don't know if building ntoskrnl.exe as a Wine dll would enable you to do what you want it to do (export functions). Yes, but I need it to have it's own address space, it's got to be an independent process. Basically we've got to fix winegcc. Ivan.

Re: building programs

On 05 Mar 2005 10:07:39 -0500, Vincent Béron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Le sam 05/03/2005 à 04:46, Ivan Leo Puoti a écrit : Vincent Béron wrote: > I don't think spec files for .exe are supported right now (sorry Ivan). That must be fixed, in windows .exe files can export functions. In Windows

Re: building programs

Le sam 05/03/2005 à 04:46, Ivan Leo Puoti a écrit : > Vincent Béron wrote: > > I don't think spec files for .exe are supported right now (sorry Ivan). > > That must be fixed, in windows .exe files can export functions. In Windows, .exe and .dll are basically the same thing (same file format, very

Re: building programs

Vincent Béron wrote: I don't think spec files for .exe are supported right now (sorry Ivan). That must be fixed, in windows .exe files can export functions. Ivan.

Re: building programs

Le ven 04/03/2005 à 19:41, Rob D a écrit : > Is it the spec file that determines whether wine looks for main or WinMain? No. If WinMain exists, it'll be used, even in the presence of main(). > > The only info about spec files I could find was on page 20 of the winelib > guide (section 3.4.2), i

Re: building programs

Is it the spec file that determines whether wine looks for main or WinMain? The only info about spec files I could find was on page 20 of the winelib guide (section 3.4.2), it says that it is very outdated and doesnt currently describe winebuild and spec files. Besides that, it doesnt have enough

building programs

I've got the impression that during program building (clock, notepad etc.) a spec file for them is created on the fly, can someone confirm/dispute this? Ivan.