Jeremy White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> Jer tells me it's deleted now; anyone still pointing to SF
> needs to update ASAP.
Sorry to jump in late, but maybe the problem could be mitigated
somewhat by putting a redirect at the old location which would
automatically send users and scripts
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 08:44:44PM +0100, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
> Hello, I replaced the sdk redistributable installer with the actualy
> installer, as the licence
> allows redistribution of the installer for end users only. It also makes
> the installation easier.
> The file contains a Micro
Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
Hem, Mike I did ask about this on wine-devel and got no answers.
I am *not* the sort of person that would take decisions like that one
without discussing it first,
but as nobody answered I thought nobody cared, it is not my intent to
interfere with anything.
I was puzzled by
Do you mean you changed SourceForge, or that the new file you posted is a
different installer somehow? I'm confused ...
I'm not touching sourceforge
Ivan.
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:44:44 +0100, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
> Hello, I replaced the sdk redistributable installer with the actualy
> installer, as the licence
> allows redistribution of the installer for end users only. It also makes
> the installation easier.
Do you mean you changed SourceForge,
Hem, Mike I did ask about this on wine-devel and got no answers.
I am *not* the sort of person that would take decisions like that one without discussing it first,
but as nobody answered I thought nobody cared, it is not my intent to interfere with anything.
I just don't think it's nice to violate
Oh well, might be good to do that then...
I just provided (in case it's needed)
http://lisas.de/~andi/wine_files/dcom95.exe
http://lisas.de/~andi/wine_files/dcom95.exe.md5
(a copy of the nonsolomicrosoft/ file) which is on the rhlx01 server,
MASSIVE bandwidth...
Hello, I replaced the sdk redist
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 03:21:10PM +0100, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
> Jeremy, we got this reply from the sourceforge staff, please remove the
> file.
Oh well, might be good to do that then...
I just provided (in case it's needed)
http://lisas.de/~andi/wine_files/dcom95.exe
http://lisas.de/~andi/
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 15:21:10 +0100, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
> Jeremy, we got this reply from the sourceforge staff, please remove the file.
Why don't you ask them why they're hosting the core fonts which are not
open source licensed then? Actually don't bother, we don't want to cause
the font guys h
Jeremy, we got this reply from the sourceforge staff, please remove the file.
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=597273
Greetings,
Only software licensed under an Open Source license may be
hosted on SourceForge.net resources. As such, no, it may not.
Thank you,
David Burley
Second Level Support Techn
So why not ask them for explicit permission, and take it down only if
they say no?
Request submitted
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1095530&group_id=1&atid=21
Ivan.
Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
Jeremy Newman wrote:
No, we need reliable US and international mirrors. Don't remove the file
again please.
Content located on any SourceForge.net-hosted subdomain which is
subject to the sole editorial control of the owner or licensee of such
subdomain, shall be subject t
IIRC such rules only apply to files released under the download section,
not stuff put in the webspace.
Go to sf.net and click on TOS at the bottom of the page.
Ivan.
Jeremy Newman wrote:
No, we need reliable US and international mirrors. Don't remove the file
again please.
Content located on any SourceForge.net-hosted subdomain which is subject to the sole editorial
control of the owner or licensee of such subdomain, shall be subject to the OSI-approved licen
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 03:43 +0100, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
> Jeremy Newman wrote:
> > Somebody removed dcom95.exe from sf.net. Was there a reason for that?
> There is a very precise reason for that, according to the sf rules you must
> provide the source code of all binaries hosted there, and all fil
No, we need reliable US and international mirrors. Don't remove the file
again please. Thanks.
On Tue, 2005-01-04 at 04:13 +0100, Ivan Leo Puoti wrote:
> > I've re-added the file as a hidden file for the moment. It won't show up
> > in the download list, but we can still link to it.
>
> If you ne
I've re-added the file as a hidden file for the moment. It won't show up
in the download list, but we can still link to it.
If you need to link to it it's here
http://spazioinwind.libero.it/nonsolomicrosoft/dcom95.exe
Ivan.
Jeremy Newman wrote:
Somebody removed dcom95.exe from sf.net. Was there a reason for that?
There is a very precise reason for that, according to the sf rules you must
provide the source code of all binaries hosted there, and all files must
comply to the open source definition. I think that ignoring
Somebody removed dcom95.exe from sf.net. Was there a reason for that? We
really need to keep that file mirrored. It's an essential file for many
programs to run under wine.
I've re-added the file as a hidden file for the moment. It won't show up
in the download list, but we can still link to it.
19 matches
Mail list logo
