Tristan Schmelcher wrote:
> I think CBR_BLOCK is only for values of type HDDEDATA. The cbData
> value here is a DWORD (specifying a length). (DWORD)-1 seems to be the
> preferred way of checking this condition in the existing code, e.g.
> see dlls/user32/dde_client.c lines 637, 648, etc.
You are
I think CBR_BLOCK is only for values of type HDDEDATA. The cbData
value here is a DWORD (specifying a length). (DWORD)-1 seems to be the
preferred way of checking this condition in the existing code, e.g.
see dlls/user32/dde_client.c lines 637, 648, etc.
I will re-send the patch in two parts.
On
Tristan Schmelcher wrote:
> +if (cbData != (DWORD)-1)
> +{
> +/* pData is not a pointer if cbData is -1, so we linearize the
> address
> + * here rather than in the calling code. */
> +pData = MapSL((SEGPTR)pData);
> +}
-1 here should be replaced by CBR_BLOCK
