Jakob Eriksson wrote:
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Jakob Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c14 Mar 2005 17:20:58 -
1.12
+++ dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c16 Mar 2005 09:32:28 -
@@ -289,8 +289,8 @@
luid.LowPart = i;
cchName =
Jakob Eriksson wrote:
Jakob Eriksson wrote:
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Jakob Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c14 Mar 2005 17:20:58 -
1.12
+++ dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c16 Mar 2005 09:32:28 -
@@ -289,8 +289,8 @@
luid.LowPart = i;
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005, Jakob Eriksson wrote:
Now I know. If the error was ERROR_NO_SUCH_PRIVILEGE, it's ok, we don't care.
Move on. NT4 has this behaviour.
If it isn't, but ret is 0, AKA LookupPrivilegeName() failed, I wan't to know
exactly
what the error was. It's a trace.
So I think the patch is
Jakob Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c14 Mar 2005 17:20:58 - 1.12
+++ dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c16 Mar 2005 09:32:28 -
@@ -289,8 +289,8 @@
luid.LowPart = i;
cchName = sizeof(buf);
ret =
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Jakob Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--- dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c 14 Mar 2005 17:20:58 - 1.12
+++ dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c 16 Mar 2005 09:32:28 -
@@ -289,8 +289,8 @@
luid.LowPart = i;
cchName = sizeof(buf);
ret =