Re: file locking

2005-07-18 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Vitaly Lipatov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > В сообщении от 16 Июль 2005 00:32 Вы написали: > > >http://wiki.winehq.org/FileLocking > > > > I'll add information I know about the problem to the wiki page. > I guessed it is not needed to communicate between servers... I think user > program will ca

Re: file locking

2005-07-18 Thread Vitaly Lipatov
В сообщении от 16 Июль 2005 00:32 Вы написали: > >http://wiki.winehq.org/FileLocking > > I'll add information I know about the problem to the wiki page. I guessed it is not needed to communicate between servers... I think user program will calls shared wineserver directly. I need to get worked sh

Re: file locking

2005-07-15 Thread Robert Shearman
Vitaly Lipatov wrote: В сообщении от 14 Июль 2005 06:09 Rob Shearman написал(a): As much of the file locking as possible is done at the file system level, but the only filesystem that supports the Windows style locking semantics is smbfs. The rest we have to emulate in the wineserver. As

Re: file locking

2005-07-14 Thread Vitaly Lipatov
В сообщении от 14 Июль 2005 06:09 Rob Shearman написал(a): > As much of the file locking as possible is done at the file system > level, but the only filesystem that supports the Windows style locking > semantics is smbfs. The rest we have to emulate in the wineserver. As > the wine

Re: file locking

2005-07-13 Thread Rob Shearman
is doing to the file. Or am I overlooking something? As much of the file locking as possible is done at the file system level, but the only filesystem that supports the Windows style locking semantics is smbfs. The rest we have to emulate in the wineserver. As the wineserver isn'

Re: file locking

2005-07-13 Thread Brian Vincent
On 13 Jul 2005 17:18:19 +0200, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you want mandatory locking then yes this has to be done at > the filesystem level, by setting the proper mount option and > permissions. man fcntl should give you the gritty details. Right. What I meant was if I'm o

Re: file locking

2005-07-13 Thread jakov
Brian Vincent wrote: >I've been playing around with file locking and Wine, namely the fact >that Wine doesn't have any. > >Is there any way around this, maybe placing the burden on a >filesystem? If I wanted to share files between two different users >(say w

Re: file locking

2005-07-13 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Brian Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've been playing around with file locking and Wine, namely the fact > that Wine doesn't have any. Wine has quite a bit of it actually. > Is there any way around this, maybe placing the burden on a > filesystem? If I wante

file locking

2005-07-12 Thread Brian Vincent
I've been playing around with file locking and Wine, namely the fact that Wine doesn't have any. Is there any way around this, maybe placing the burden on a filesystem? If I wanted to share files between two different users (say with something dumb like file permissions 666), is there