The latest Wine
RPMs are compiled without BiDi support
the Red Hat rpms may be, but I can assure you that your help to get bidi into the
mdk rpms wasn't invane.
Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
The latest Wine
RPMs are compiled without BiDi support
the Red Hat rpms may be, but I can assure you that your help to get bidi into the
mdk rpms wasn't invane.
Greedy ol' me, trying to get them all :-)
Shachar
--
Shachar Shemesh
Open Source
Keith Matthews wrote:
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 19:09:04 +0300
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am the RH package manager for Wine.
My RPMS are indeed without BiDi support for now, as I was aiming for
them to be rebuildable on any fully-updated (and nothing more) RH
box. Of course, I can
Le mar 09/09/2003 12:50, Keith Matthews a crit :
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 19:09:04 +0300
Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am the RH package manager for Wine.
My RPMS are indeed without BiDi support for now, as I was aiming for
them to be rebuildable on any fully-updated (and
On September 9, 2003 10:18 am, Vincent Bron wrote:
Le mar 09/09/2003 12:50, Keith Matthews a crit :
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 19:09:04 +0300
snip
I think you should be considering multiple, alternative packages. Yes, I
know it is more work, but even the current packages have dependencies on
, except that rpm insists on the appropriate packages being installed before
it will even install the wine. Personally my environment is for business
computing. I only have a sound card because it is on the board; I don't have
speakers. So I have no need for sound, scanner support,
Le mar 09/09/2003 10:14, Shachar Shemesh a crit :
Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
The latest Wine
RPMs are compiled without BiDi support
the Red Hat rpms may be, but I can assure you that your help to get bidi into the
mdk rpms wasn't invane.
Greedy ol' me, trying to get them all
Le mar 09/09/2003 12:09, Shachar Shemesh a crit :
As all you have to do is have a local copy of the ICU library in order
to get BiDi support in (and configure will autodetect it), I don't think
having your RPMs compiled with BiDi support will hurt in any way. Your
SRPMS will still be
Le mar 09/09/2003 13:47, Bill Medland a crit :
, except that rpm insists on the appropriate packages being installed before
it will even install the wine. Personally my environment is for business
computing. I only have a sound card because it is on the board; I don't have
speakers. So
Le mar 09/09/2003 13:33, Shachar Shemesh a crit :
Yes. I posted the source for a small program that tests this. It's
available at http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-devel/2003/08/0175.html.
Thanks.
There is one gotcha that still needs to be looked into. It appears that
even when ICU is
Murray-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wine-devel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:35 AM
Subject: for Red Hat packager
Could the Red Hat packager please take care of this
http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-users/2003/09/0081.html
I don't know if it's a rpm packaging error
Could the Red Hat packager please take care of this
http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-users/2003/09/0081.html
I don't know if it's a rpm packaging error or a problem with the users system
setup, but I suppose the creator of the rpm can solve the issue quite easily.
12 matches
Mail list logo