Re: for Red Hat packager

2003-09-09 Thread Ivan Leo Murray-Smith
The latest Wine RPMs are compiled without BiDi support the Red Hat rpms may be, but I can assure you that your help to get bidi into the mdk rpms wasn't invane.

Re: for Red Hat packager

2003-09-09 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote: The latest Wine RPMs are compiled without BiDi support the Red Hat rpms may be, but I can assure you that your help to get bidi into the mdk rpms wasn't invane. Greedy ol' me, trying to get them all :-) Shachar -- Shachar Shemesh Open Source

Re: for Red Hat packager

2003-09-09 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Keith Matthews wrote: On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 19:09:04 +0300 Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am the RH package manager for Wine. My RPMS are indeed without BiDi support for now, as I was aiming for them to be rebuildable on any fully-updated (and nothing more) RH box. Of course, I can

Re: for Red Hat packager

2003-09-09 Thread Vincent Béron
Le mar 09/09/2003 12:50, Keith Matthews a crit : On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 19:09:04 +0300 Shachar Shemesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am the RH package manager for Wine. My RPMS are indeed without BiDi support for now, as I was aiming for them to be rebuildable on any fully-updated (and

Re: for Red Hat packager

2003-09-09 Thread Bill Medland
On September 9, 2003 10:18 am, Vincent Bron wrote: Le mar 09/09/2003 12:50, Keith Matthews a crit : On Tue, 09 Sep 2003 19:09:04 +0300 snip I think you should be considering multiple, alternative packages. Yes, I know it is more work, but even the current packages have dependencies on

Re: for Red Hat packager

2003-09-09 Thread Marcus Meissner
, except that rpm insists on the appropriate packages being installed before it will even install the wine. Personally my environment is for business computing. I only have a sound card because it is on the board; I don't have speakers. So I have no need for sound, scanner support,

Re: for Red Hat packager

2003-09-09 Thread Vincent Béron
Le mar 09/09/2003 10:14, Shachar Shemesh a crit : Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote: The latest Wine RPMs are compiled without BiDi support the Red Hat rpms may be, but I can assure you that your help to get bidi into the mdk rpms wasn't invane. Greedy ol' me, trying to get them all

Re: for Red Hat packager

2003-09-09 Thread Vincent Béron
Le mar 09/09/2003 12:09, Shachar Shemesh a crit : As all you have to do is have a local copy of the ICU library in order to get BiDi support in (and configure will autodetect it), I don't think having your RPMs compiled with BiDi support will hurt in any way. Your SRPMS will still be

Re: for Red Hat packager

2003-09-09 Thread Vincent Béron
Le mar 09/09/2003 13:47, Bill Medland a crit : , except that rpm insists on the appropriate packages being installed before it will even install the wine. Personally my environment is for business computing. I only have a sound card because it is on the board; I don't have speakers. So

Re: for Red Hat packager

2003-09-09 Thread Vincent Béron
Le mar 09/09/2003 13:33, Shachar Shemesh a crit : Yes. I posted the source for a small program that tests this. It's available at http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-devel/2003/08/0175.html. Thanks. There is one gotcha that still needs to be looked into. It appears that even when ICU is

Re: for Red Hat packager

2003-09-08 Thread Marcelo Duarte
Murray-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: wine-devel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 12:35 AM Subject: for Red Hat packager Could the Red Hat packager please take care of this http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-users/2003/09/0081.html I don't know if it's a rpm packaging error

for Red Hat packager

2003-09-08 Thread Ivan Leo Murray-Smith
Could the Red Hat packager please take care of this http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-users/2003/09/0081.html I don't know if it's a rpm packaging error or a problem with the users system setup, but I suppose the creator of the rpm can solve the issue quite easily.