On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 01:34:09PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
Huw Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-ok(sz1.cx == sz2.cx sz1.cy == sz2.cy,
- results from GetTextExtentExPointW and GetTextExtentPointW
differ\n);
+ok(sz1.cy == sz2.cy,
+ cy from GetTextExtentExPointW
Huw Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+todo_wine {
+/* The \n in the string is apparently handled differently in
GetTextExtentPoint and GetTextExtentExPoint */
+ok(sz1.cx != sz2.cx,
+ cx from GetTextExtentExPointW (%ld) and GetTextExtentPointW (%ld)
are the same\n, sz1.cx,
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 06:09:10PM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
I accidently left 2 tests in my comment, that may have been misleading.
Just to clarify things: an actual test which fails for me is the one in
the todo_wine block.
Yup, I guessed that's what you meant. I've just sent a patch
Huw Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-ok(sz1.cx == sz2.cx sz1.cy == sz2.cy,
- results from GetTextExtentExPointW and GetTextExtentPointW differ\n);
+ok(sz1.cy == sz2.cy,
+ cy from GetTextExtentExPointW (%ld) and GetTextExtentPointW (%ld)
differ\n, sz1.cy, sz2.cy);