Thursday, January 5, 2006, 2:15:21 AM, Stefan Leichter wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2006 06:36 schrieb Dmitry Timoshkov:
>> "Stefan Leichter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > ChangeLog
>> > ---
>> > add a test for CreateDCW
>>
>> 1. there is no need to import CreateDCW dynamically,
"Stefan Leichter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does test_enumdisplaydevices() return any todo:s to you on wine? Not for me.
The new tests returns a todo, so why do you think it is redundant?
In which way new test fails for you? GDI should be able to handle "\\.\DISPLAY1"
in CreateDC these days.
Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2006 06:36 schrieb Dmitry Timoshkov:
> "Stefan Leichter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ChangeLog
> > ---
> > add a test for CreateDCW
>
> 1. there is no need to import CreateDCW dynamically, it always exists
> 2. dlls/user/tests/monitor.c,test_enumdisplaydevice
"Stefan Leichter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ChangeLog
---
add a test for CreateDCW
1. there is no need to import CreateDCW dynamically, it always exists
2. dlls/user/tests/monitor.c,test_enumdisplaydevices() test already
does this, so your test is redundant.
--
Dmitry.
"Dmitry Timoshkov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Jakob Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> http://test.winehq.org/data/200501151000/2000_JakobEriksson/gdi32:metafile.txt
>>
>> This fails. It shouldn't, because I ran winetest manually.
>>
>> http://test.winehq.org/data/200501151000/2000_Ja
"Jakob Eriksson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://test.winehq.org/data/200501151000/2000_JakobEriksson/gdi32:metafile.txt
>
> This fails. It shouldn't, because I ran winetest manually.
>
> http://test.winehq.org/data/200501151000/2000_JakobEriksson/version.txt
>
>
> what's up with that?
Th
http://test.winehq.org/data/200501151000/2000_JakobEriksson/gdi32:metafile.txt
This fails. It shouldn't, because I ran winetest manually.
http://test.winehq.org/data/200501151000/2000_JakobEriksson/version.txt
what's up with that?
regards,
Jakob