Re: http://ftp.codeweavers.com/pub/crossover/office/source/office-src-4.1.0.tgz

2005-03-03 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Mike McCormack wrote: It can be compiled into the same binaries as used in CrossOver, but only if you use the same compiler, headers and libraries as we use. Or close enough to it. It's been done before. http://lingnu.com/support.html Shachar -- Shachar Shemesh Lingnu Open Source Consulti

Re: http://ftp.codeweavers.com/pub/crossover/office/source/office-src-4.1.0.tgz

2005-03-03 Thread Mike McCormack
Grant Williamson wrote: I am just wondering how much does the wine source located on http://ftp.codeweavers.com/pub/crossover/office/source/office-src-4.1.0.tgz differ from 20040716. I guess its codeweavers internal patched version, I see changes in there dating to January. Are there any

Re: http://ftp.codeweavers.com/pub/crossover/office/source/office-src-4.1.0.tgz

2005-03-03 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Short answer - RTFM Grant Williamson wrote: Hi, I am just wondering how much does the wine source located on http://ftp.codeweavers.com/pub/crossover/office/source/office-src-4.1.0.tgz differ from 20040716. RTFM diff -r I guess its codeweavers internal patched version, I see changes in there

http://ftp.codeweavers.com/pub/crossover/office/source/office-src-4.1.0.tgz

2005-03-03 Thread Grant Williamson
Hi, I am just wondering how much does the wine source located on http://ftp.codeweavers.com/pub/crossover/office/source/office-src-4.1.0.tgz differ from 20040716. I guess its codeweavers internal patched version, I see changes in there dating to January. Are there any restrictions on using