Maarten Lankhorst writes:
>> That doesn't match the PSDK I have, and yes it has a C definition that
>> is different from the C++ one, but is also different from yours.
> Mine doesn't seem to have a C definition at all, but from the
> devpropdef one I assume the C version takes a PROPERTYKEY as pa
Hi AJ,
2010/2/22 Alexandre Julliard :
> Maarten Lankhorst writes:
>
>>> This doesn't match the PSDK. Where does this come from?
>> In C, REFPROPERTYKEY becomes PROPERTYKEY*, in C++ it's PROPERTYKEY &,
>> so IsEqualPropertyKey will need a different macro. The psdk doesn't
>> define this properly f
Maarten Lankhorst writes:
>> This doesn't match the PSDK. Where does this come from?
> In C, REFPROPERTYKEY becomes PROPERTYKEY*, in C++ it's PROPERTYKEY &,
> so IsEqualPropertyKey will need a different macro. The psdk doesn't
> define this properly for the C case, but since I need it in C code I
Hi AJ,
2010/2/22 Alexandre Julliard :
> Maarten Lankhorst writes:
>
>> @@ -48,7 +48,11 @@
>> #endif
>>
>> #ifndef IsEqualPropertyKey
>> +#ifdef __cplusplus
>> #define IsEqualPropertyKey(a,b) (((a).pid == (b).pid) &&
>> IsEqualIID((a).fmtid,(b).fmtid))
>> +#else
>> +#define IsEqualPropertyKey(
Maarten Lankhorst writes:
> @@ -48,7 +48,11 @@
> #endif
>
> #ifndef IsEqualPropertyKey
> +#ifdef __cplusplus
> #define IsEqualPropertyKey(a,b) (((a).pid == (b).pid) &&
> IsEqualIID((a).fmtid,(b).fmtid))
> +#else
> +#define IsEqualPropertyKey(a,b) (((a)->pid == (b)->pid) &&
> IsEqualIID(&(a
