On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Michael Karcher wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 21.09.2008, 02:15 +0200 schrieb Erik Inge Bolsø:
+ok(1, %s\n, content);
Please use trace(...) instead of ok(1,...). Also, outputting a string
with newline characters might be irritating, especially as one might
need a hex viewer
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Michael Karcher wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 21.09.2008, 15:13 +0200 schrieb Erik Inge Bolsø:
Without modifying the test messages, we'll only get
a line number, and no mention of which data caused the test to fail.
You just look some lines upwards to the trace output. It's
Am Sonntag, den 21.09.2008, 02:15 +0200 schrieb Erik Inge Bolsø:
+ok(1, %s\n, content);
Please use trace(...) instead of ok(1,...). Also, outputting a string
with newline characters might be irritating, especially as one might
need a hex viewer to see the difference between the CR-only and
Am Sonntag, den 21.09.2008, 15:13 +0200 schrieb Erik Inge Bolsø:
-ok(ret == 18, Expected 18, got %d\n, ret);
+ok(ret == 18, Run %d: Expected 18, got %d\n, run, ret);
Questions to everyone: I suppose if the trace above indicates the run
number, these modifications are unneded. Do
