On November 17, 2003 10:47 am, Huw D M Davies wrote:
> I guess that's because there are several other calls to
> LISTBOX_GetItemRect that have the same syntax. Note that
> LISTBOX_GetItemRect can return -1 on error.
Of course, my bad, I've commented without actually checking out
the code. Please
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 10:33:33AM -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On November 17, 2003 10:16 am, Huw D M Davies wrote:
> > +if (LISTBOX_GetItemRect( descr, index, &rect ) == 1)
>
> OK, I very sorry to nick pick so much, but this test is not
> only strange in C, but it's a bit dangerous as we
On November 17, 2003 10:16 am, Huw D M Davies wrote:
> +if (LISTBOX_GetItemRect( descr, index, &rect ) == 1)
OK, I very sorry to nick pick so much, but this test is not
only strange in C, but it's a bit dangerous as well, since
in the future LISTBOX_GetItemRect may return something >1
for TRUE
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 09:59:20AM -0500, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> Why not simply invalidate rect always, even when not in owner draw?
Works for me.
Aric Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
invalidate items on setselection.
--
Huw Davies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: controls/listbox.c
=
On November 17, 2003 07:33 am, Huw D M Davies wrote:
> -LISTBOX_RepaintItem( hwnd, descr, i, ODA_SELECT );
> +if (!IS_OWNERDRAW(descr))
> +LISTBOX_RepaintItem( hwnd, descr, i, ODA_SELECT );
> +else
> +LISTBOX_InvalidateItemRect(hwn
