On 8 June 2010 00:56, Alexander Scott-Johns
wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> On 7 June 2010 20:04, Thomas Heckel wrote:
>> Hi Alexander,
>>
>> I was wondering why your patch b205fd8108eca2fd29705875e53ed852f56a6b6d
>> "Proberly skip if functions are not available" made test errors on NT4
>> and Win95 test in
Thomas,
On 7 June 2010 20:04, Thomas Heckel wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> I was wondering why your patch b205fd8108eca2fd29705875e53ed852f56a6b6d
> "Proberly skip if functions are not available" made test errors on NT4
> and Win95 test instead of a skip while it works on newer windows
> platforms as
On 06/07/2010 09:04 PM, Thomas Heckel wrote:
Hi Alexander,
I was wondering why your patch b205fd8108eca2fd29705875e53ed852f56a6b6d
"Proberly skip if functions are not available" made test errors on NT4
and Win95 test instead of a skip while it works on newer windows
platforms as expected.
The
Hi Alexander,
I was wondering why your patch b205fd8108eca2fd29705875e53ed852f56a6b6d
"Proberly skip if functions are not available" made test errors on NT4
and Win95 test instead of a skip while it works on newer windows
platforms as expected.
Could this be the case because GetModuleHandle and t