Re: msvcrt printf test failed on NT4,win95

2010-06-08 Thread Alexander Scott-Johns
On 8 June 2010 00:56, Alexander Scott-Johns wrote: > Thomas, > > On 7 June 2010 20:04, Thomas Heckel wrote: >> Hi Alexander, >> >> I was wondering why your patch b205fd8108eca2fd29705875e53ed852f56a6b6d >> "Proberly skip if functions are not available" made test errors on NT4 >> and Win95 test in

Re: msvcrt printf test failed on NT4,win95

2010-06-07 Thread Alexander Scott-Johns
Thomas, On 7 June 2010 20:04, Thomas Heckel wrote: > Hi Alexander, > > I was wondering why your patch b205fd8108eca2fd29705875e53ed852f56a6b6d > "Proberly skip if functions are not available" made test errors on NT4 > and Win95 test instead of a skip while it works on newer windows > platforms as

Re: msvcrt printf test failed on NT4,win95

2010-06-07 Thread Paul Vriens
On 06/07/2010 09:04 PM, Thomas Heckel wrote: Hi Alexander, I was wondering why your patch b205fd8108eca2fd29705875e53ed852f56a6b6d "Proberly skip if functions are not available" made test errors on NT4 and Win95 test instead of a skip while it works on newer windows platforms as expected. The

msvcrt printf test failed on NT4,win95

2010-06-07 Thread Thomas Heckel
Hi Alexander, I was wondering why your patch b205fd8108eca2fd29705875e53ed852f56a6b6d "Proberly skip if functions are not available" made test errors on NT4 and Win95 test instead of a skip while it works on newer windows platforms as expected. Could this be the case because GetModuleHandle and t