Francois Gouget wrote:
Uwe Bonnes wrote:
[...]
Missing MFC42 and other redistributable DLLs is a showstopper for
winelib
and running windows code on non i386 archtecture...
Well, not quite. If you're going to use Winelib it means that you have
the source of the application. And if it is
Am Freitag, 7. September 2007 10:05:25 schrieb Uwe Bonnes:
Missing MFC42 and other redistributable DLLs is a showstopper for winelib
and running windows code on non i386 archtecture...
I think you can compile MFC42 for winelib and other architectures, the source
code is publically
Dan == Dan Kegel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dan Misha wrote:
and even my version of Windows 98 is bundled with mfc42.dll, so wine
really should provide it too... [our own version, not Microsoft's.]
Dan Well, sure. Same goes for a lot of things. But since mfc42.dll is
Dan
Uwe Bonnes wrote:
[...]
Missing MFC42 and other redistributable DLLs is a showstopper for winelib
and running windows code on non i386 archtecture...
Well, not quite. If you're going to use Winelib it means that you have
the source of the application. And if it is using the MFC it should mean
Misha wrote:
and even my version of Windows 98 is bundled with mfc42.dll, so wine really
should
provide it too... [our own version, not Microsoft's.]
Well, sure. Same goes for a lot of things. But
since mfc42.dll is a Visual C++ runtime file that
has very liberal redistribution terms and
On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 06:17 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
Misha wrote:
and even my version of Windows 98 is bundled with mfc42.dll, so wine really
should
provide it too... [our own version, not Microsoft's.]
Well, sure. Same goes for a lot of things. But
since mfc42.dll is a Visual C++
