On Monday 17 September 2007, you wrote:
> On Monday 17 September 2007 15:10:39 Kuba Ober wrote:
> > > I obviously tried WINE then, but it didn't work,
> > > however, dosbox works with it (though slow, obviously)
> >
> > Wine will not be any faster. Dosbox doesn't emulate the CPU (at least
> > when
On Monday 17 September 2007 15:10:39 Kuba Ober wrote:
> > I obviously tried WINE then, but it didn't work,
> > however, dosbox works with it (though slow, obviously)
>
> Wine will not be any faster. Dosbox doesn't emulate the CPU (at least when
> run on x86 machines), it's your old good VM environm
> I obviously tried WINE then, but it didn't work,
> however, dosbox works with it (though slow, obviously)
Wine will not be any faster. Dosbox doesn't emulate the CPU (at least when run
on x86 machines), it's your old good VM environment, just like if you ran DOS
under win9x.
Cheers, Kuba
> I have a program, that I got like ages ago. It
> effectively is an atari emulator for dos, by the name
> "pacifist", but I originally got it installed under
> windows ME. It has an old atari-basic program
> "installed" in it, (a simple game) written by a friend
> in it, which I wanted to play.
>
Hello,
I have a program, that I got like ages ago. It
effectively is an atari emulator for dos, by the name
"pacifist", but I originally got it installed under
windows ME. It has an old atari-basic program
"installed" in it, (a simple game) written by a friend
in it, which I wanted to play.
I dec
