On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Robert Shearman wrote:
[...]
> Is there any pattern to those that are missing it?
I have not found it yet.
> I would only expect to see the COM_NO_WINDOWS_H stuff in headers generated
> from IDL files with at least one interface with the object keyword.
Ah, you must know mo
Francois Gouget wrote:
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Robert Shearman wrote:
[...]
Actually, in the PSDK there seems to be a correlation between
COM_NO_WINDOWS_H and idl files. It's not 100% but that may be just be
because they don't ship all the idl files. Also, the COM_NO_WINDOWS_H #ifdef
is not pres
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006, Robert Shearman wrote:
[...]
> > Actually, in the PSDK there seems to be a correlation between
> > COM_NO_WINDOWS_H and idl files. It's not 100% but that may be just be
> > because they don't ship all the idl files. Also, the COM_NO_WINDOWS_H #ifdef
> > is not present in the id
Francois Gouget wrote:
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
2) Or modify these sections so they read:
#if !defined(COM_NO_WINDOWS_H) && !defined(__WINESRC__)
# include
# include
#endif
I think we want th
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > 2) Or modify these sections so they read:
> >
> > #if !defined(COM_NO_WINDOWS_H) && !defined(__WINESRC__)
> > # include
> > # include
> > #endif
>
> I think we want that, otherwi
Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2) Or modify these sections so they read:
>
> #if !defined(COM_NO_WINDOWS_H) && !defined(__WINESRC__)
> # include
> # include
> #endif
I think we want that, otherwise we'll end up having to add
COM_NO_WINDOWS_H to pretty much every
