Is it worth a few extra page impressions to dispose of the meaningful
version progress of Wine?
I would say no.
Wine will be popular regardless of its version string as long as it
continues to support a large set of applications. I'm of the stronger
opinion that we should be releasing our own pr
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 21:27:16 +0200
Remco wrote:
> How about, instead of calling the next major release version 1.2, call
> it version 2.0? The reason is purely marketing: an x.0 number will
> attract more press. Last major release was 1.0. It seems fitting to
> have the next major release be 2.0.
I would be fine with calling this wine 2.0, since it adds
a major new feature (64 bit compatibility).
