Hi,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 03:43:40PM -0800, Steven Edwards wrote about 'Re:
registry TODO':
> --- Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How is ReactOS's current (future) system?
> I think ReactOS's registry is binary compatible with NT4.
Hi,
--- Boaz Harrosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How is ReactOS's current (future) system?
I think ReactOS's registry is binary compatible with NT4. It and the windows
2000 format was
documented/reversed for samba and the linux ntchpwd bootdisk projects. If I
remeber right Eirc
Kohl offered to
Boaz Harrosh wrote:
Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
How is ReactOS's current (future) system?
See above
I was Just asking what ReactOS is doing, not that they need change.
ReactOS is different in this respect, I agree.
Is ReactOS's format the same as Windows. or do you have your own
Binary format?
We
Is ReactOS's format the same as Windows. or do you have your own Binary
The answer to "is the reactos registry format the same as windows" depends
on which version of windows you are comparing it to.
Windows 95/98/ME used system.dat and user.dat to store the registry.
NT kernels (NT4, 2000, XP et
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, James Hawkins wrote:
[...]
What needs to be done concerning this TODO? Looking through Bugzilla
I found bug #422:
"Currently Wine loads the complete registry into memory at startup. This is
relatively ok when the registry is small such as in fake_windows configurations,
but wh
James Hawkins wrote:
Nobody's working on it, so it won't be supported until someone cares
enough to do it. I encouraged a few people to start working on it but
nobody did, so taking out the existing support is a way to provide
more encouragement. If that's not enough then the feature simply won't
b
Alexandre,
Recently you removed the loading of the Windows registry on startup
and stated that
> Nobody's working on it, so it won't be supported until someone cares
> enough to do it. I encouraged a few people to start working on it but
> nobody did, so taking out the existing support is a way t
