Le 11/06/2010 03:52, James McKenzie a écrit :
How can I get OLDER information on patches from previous releases?
You should have a look at http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo.
Everything is archived (patches submitted, commits and of course this
mailing list)
It's very useful when someone
On 06/11/2010 08:38 AM, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
2010/6/11 Dmitry Timoshkov:
Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
I see this patch has been "Rejected" in
http://source.winehq.org/patches/, but I just wondered why:
- are the UTF8 resources not preferred over custom codepages?
- or is the patch simply too bi
2010/6/11 Dmitry Timoshkov :
> Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
>
>> I see this patch has been "Rejected" in
>> http://source.winehq.org/patches/, but I just wondered why:
>> - are the UTF8 resources not preferred over custom codepages?
>> - or is the patch simply too big to review? Splitting into many tin
Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> I see this patch has been "Rejected" in
> http://source.winehq.org/patches/, but I just wondered why:
> - are the UTF8 resources not preferred over custom codepages?
> - or is the patch simply too big to review? Splitting into many tiny
> patches seemed a bit overkill fo
Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
Hi.
I see this patch has been "Rejected" in
http://source.winehq.org/patches/,
Could be formatted incorrectly or just basically contain invalid
information (not incorrect) as the format of the patch does not include
things like th #pragma line.
However, I have a m
Hi.
I see this patch has been "Rejected" in
http://source.winehq.org/patches/, but I just wondered why:
- are the UTF8 resources not preferred over custom codepages?
- or is the patch simply too big to review? Splitting into many tiny
patches seemed a bit overkill for such a simple change, no?
Or
