is not related to patch shell32: FOF_MULTIDESTFILES must be set
when copying files into directory
If the translation of rather than is instead of, now I see my fault.
But this test is passed in windows (win2k3). It doesn't pass in wine.
So, it show difference between windows and wine behaviour.
So
(testdir2\\test4.txt), Expected the directory
'test4.txt' to exist\n);
| +}
This test is not related to patch shell32: FOF_MULTIDESTFILES must be set
when copying files into directory
If the translation of rather than is instead of, now I see my fault.
But this test is passed in windows
We've been over this before. This needs a test case. Either way,
this doesn't look right. What are you trying to fix?
Some program call SHFileOperationW to move one folder to another without
FOF_MULTIDESTFILES. The source folder contain subfolders, so SHFileOperationW
is called recursively.
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 5:48 AM, Vitaly Perov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've been over this before. This needs a test case. Either way,
this doesn't look right. What are you trying to fix?
Some program call SHFileOperationW to move one folder to another without
FOF_MULTIDESTFILES. The source
You never mentioned a specific program, so I still don't know if this
is a real world bug you're running into. Either way, your logic is
flawed, as fileOp.pTo is a single directory in this case, so using
FOF_MULTIDESTFILES is wrong.
MSDN: FOF_MULTIDESTFILES
The pTo member specifies
2008/10/18 Vitaly Perov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
The program is Garant 7 F1 (Russian legal system database). I don't think you
know this program.
It is not a real world bug, but there are some significant bugs in
SHFileOperationW. I don't think a lot of programs use SHFileOperationW to
move a
Thank you for your answer.
I agree, that before sending a patch I should write a test first.
But the problem is that even a tests are ignored without any explanation.
Maybe my tests aren't good, but why anybody just tell what's wrong.
Maybe a'm not enough persistent?
Have you tried asking on
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 7:47 AM, Vitaly Perov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You never mentioned a specific program, so I still don't know if this
is a real world bug you're running into. Either way, your logic is
flawed, as fileOp.pTo is a single directory in this case, so using
Thank you for your answer.
I agree, that before sending a patch I should write a test first.
But the problem is that even a tests are ignored without any explanation.
Maybe my tests aren't good, but why anybody just tell what's wrong.
Seems to be common habit on this list. I hope you're not
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Louis. Lenders
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you for your answer.
I agree, that before sending a patch I should write a test first.
But the problem is that even a tests are ignored without any explanation.
Maybe my tests aren't good, but why anybody just tell
Am Samstag, den 18.10.2008, 22:18 + schrieb Louis. Lenders:
Spent loads of time for more than 3 years trying to help triaging bugs
and helping out in appdb, only to find out that all my patches are
ignored silently
Sorry, what do you mean by *all* of your patches?
This is from the wine
2008/10/17 Vitaly Perov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From e2eec69ff86960bd6729a3105747310ce9c256fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vitaly Perov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:56:46 +0400
Subject: [PATCH] shell32: FOF_MULTIDESTFILES must be set when copying files
into directory
12 matches
Mail list logo
