A friendly soul pointed out to me that I had missed three(!) responses
to my patch which went to wine-devel@. Sorry about that, I'll see to
set up some mail filters to prevent that from happening.
For the record, somehow I got mislead re the semantics of sizeof, and
that after some 25 years of pr
On 06/04/2011 03:02 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Resending: This really looks like a straightforward bug fix and the
current code definitely wrong???
The difference between two pointers (of the same type) is the number
of elements, not the number of bytes. Thus the code below was way
incorrect,
On Jun 4, 2011, at 8:02 AM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Resending: This really looks like a straightforward bug fix and the
> current code definitely wrong???
No. As others have pointed out, your logic is wrong. The existing code is
correct.
> The difference between two pointers (of the same typ
