On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Austin English wrote:
> These all sound like packaging problems..
But still worth discussing here, I think.
- Dan
(CC Scott)
About the packaging issues, I have to agree the current system seems a
bit counter-intuitive. I believe this was discussed before - something
about debian naming rules - but given the development cycle of wine,
wouldn't something like google-chrome's naming be better?
wine-stable (1.0,
On 25/06/2011, at 11:38, Austin English wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 18:58, Dan Kegel wrote:
>> http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/231065/ubuntu_linux_day_23_would_you_like_some_wine_with_that.html
>>
>> First problem - ubuntu's package manager is unclear:
>>
>> "I opened up my
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 18:58, Dan Kegel wrote:
> http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/231065/ubuntu_linux_day_23_would_you_like_some_wine_with_that.html
>
> First problem - ubuntu's package manager is unclear:
>
> "I opened up my handy-dandy Ubuntu Software Center and typed Wine in
> the
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/231065/ubuntu_linux_day_23_would_you_like_some_wine_with_that.html
First problem - ubuntu's package manager is unclear:
"I opened up my handy-dandy Ubuntu Software Center and typed Wine in
the search field, and...WTF? There are 14 matching items that
