Am 08.10.2012 12:35, schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
> André Hentschel writes:
>
>> Sry, seen this too late.
>> I need it for user32/tests/edit.c: test_extra_values()
>> It expects the size of the edit class like this:
>>
>> #ifdef _WIN64
>> {"Edit",8,8},
>> #else
>> {"Edit",6,8},
>> #endif
>
André Hentschel writes:
> Sry, seen this too late.
> I need it for user32/tests/edit.c: test_extra_values()
> It expects the size of the edit class like this:
>
> #ifdef _WIN64
> {"Edit",8,8},
> #else
> {"Edit",6,8},
> #endif
>
> So this fails on e.g. ARM because code and test use differe
Am 04.10.2012 10:40, schrieb Alexandre Julliard:
> André Hentschel writes:
>
>> @@ -5173,10 +5173,10 @@ const struct builtin_class_descr EDIT_builtin_class =
>> editW,/* name */
>> CS_DBLCLKS | CS_PARENTDC, /* style */
>> WINPROC_EDIT, /* proc */
>> -#ifde
André Hentschel writes:
> @@ -5173,10 +5173,10 @@ const struct builtin_class_descr EDIT_builtin_class =
> editW,/* name */
> CS_DBLCLKS | CS_PARENTDC, /* style */
> WINPROC_EDIT, /* proc */
> -#ifdef __i386__
> -sizeof(EDITSTATE *) + sizeof(WORD), /* e