Re: user32: Fix the edit class extra byte count on non-x86 platforms (try 2)

2012-10-08 Thread André Hentschel
Am 08.10.2012 12:35, schrieb Alexandre Julliard: > André Hentschel writes: > >> Sry, seen this too late. >> I need it for user32/tests/edit.c: test_extra_values() >> It expects the size of the edit class like this: >> >> #ifdef _WIN64 >> {"Edit",8,8}, >> #else >> {"Edit",6,8}, >> #endif >

Re: user32: Fix the edit class extra byte count on non-x86 platforms (try 2)

2012-10-08 Thread Alexandre Julliard
André Hentschel writes: > Sry, seen this too late. > I need it for user32/tests/edit.c: test_extra_values() > It expects the size of the edit class like this: > > #ifdef _WIN64 > {"Edit",8,8}, > #else > {"Edit",6,8}, > #endif > > So this fails on e.g. ARM because code and test use differe

Re: user32: Fix the edit class extra byte count on non-x86 platforms (try 2)

2012-10-07 Thread André Hentschel
Am 04.10.2012 10:40, schrieb Alexandre Julliard: > André Hentschel writes: > >> @@ -5173,10 +5173,10 @@ const struct builtin_class_descr EDIT_builtin_class = >> editW,/* name */ >> CS_DBLCLKS | CS_PARENTDC, /* style */ >> WINPROC_EDIT, /* proc */ >> -#ifde

Re: user32: Fix the edit class extra byte count on non-x86 platforms (try 2)

2012-10-04 Thread Alexandre Julliard
André Hentschel writes: > @@ -5173,10 +5173,10 @@ const struct builtin_class_descr EDIT_builtin_class = > editW,/* name */ > CS_DBLCLKS | CS_PARENTDC, /* style */ > WINPROC_EDIT, /* proc */ > -#ifdef __i386__ > -sizeof(EDITSTATE *) + sizeof(WORD), /* e