Re: what's the proper way to define a COM interface that takes function pointers as arguments?

Never mind. Henri has pointed out that I am on crack and this totally works. On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Vincent Povirk wrote: > I am trying to define the ICLRRuntimeHost interface. > > It has this method: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms164410.aspx > > One of the arguments is a

what's the proper way to define a COM interface that takes function pointers as arguments?

I am trying to define the ICLRRuntimeHost interface. It has this method: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms164410.aspx One of the arguments is a function pointer type: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa964757.aspx Widl fails when I try to define a function pointer type using C sy