On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:12:23AM +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
-fprintf(file, varname);
+fprintf(file, %s, varname);
fputs() would be a faster alternative to that. Though i doubt that
matters in this case.
FWIW gcc tends to convert fprintf(file, %s, arg) into
Dan Hipschman wrote:
This is just a minor cleanup patch. Even if we're definitely sure a
string doesn't contain any % signs, it's still better not to use it as a
printf format string.
fputs() would be a faster alternative to that. Though i doubt that
matters in this case.
bye
michael
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:12:23AM +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
Dan Hipschman wrote:
This is just a minor cleanup patch. Even if we're definitely sure a
string doesn't contain any % signs, it's still better not to use it as a
printf format string.
fputs() would be a faster alternative
Dan Hipschman wrote:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:12:23AM +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
Dan Hipschman wrote:
This is just a minor cleanup patch. Even if we're definitely sure a
string doesn't contain any % signs, it's still better not to use it as a
printf format string.
fputs() would be a
