On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:12:23AM +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> > -fprintf(file, varname);
> > +fprintf(file, "%s", varname);
> fputs() would be a faster alternative to that. Though i doubt that
> matters in this case.
FWIW gcc tends to convert fprintf(file, "%s", arg) into
Dan Hipschman wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:12:23AM +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
>> Dan Hipschman wrote:
>>> This is just a minor cleanup patch. Even if we're definitely sure a
>>> string doesn't contain any % signs, it's still better not to use it as a
>>> printf format string.
>> fputs(
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 11:12:23AM +0200, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Dan Hipschman wrote:
> > This is just a minor cleanup patch. Even if we're definitely sure a
> > string doesn't contain any % signs, it's still better not to use it as a
> > printf format string.
> fputs() would be a faster alter
Dan Hipschman wrote:
> This is just a minor cleanup patch. Even if we're definitely sure a
> string doesn't contain any % signs, it's still better not to use it as a
> printf format string.
fputs() would be a faster alternative to that. Though i doubt that
matters in this case.
bye
michae
