tor, 12.02.2004 kl. 01.51 skrev Alexandre Julliard:
> Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Incidentally, that means I also reversed his indentation suppression of
> > the arguments of these function pointers, but I don't see the "old"
> > indentation as a problem - after all, MIDL does not
Ove Kaaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Incidentally, that means I also reversed his indentation suppression of
> the arguments of these function pointers, but I don't see the "old"
> indentation as a problem - after all, MIDL does not suppress indentation
> of function pointer arguments, why sho
