Ken Thomases wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Andrey Turkin wrote:
>
>
>> Marius Slyzius wrote:
>>
>>> 2) possible bug: the server sends 1500 bytes with WsaSend ( with 2
>>> WSABUFFER ) and the client receive only 1452 bytes and calls WsaRecv
>>> again. Also on the server, the completio
On Dec 3, 2007, at 4:05 PM, Andrey Turkin wrote:
> Marius Slyzius wrote:
>> 2) possible bug: the server sends 1500 bytes with WsaSend ( with 2
>> WSABUFFER ) and the client receive only 1452 bytes and calls WsaRecv
>> again. Also on the server, the completion port receive event that
>> transferred
Marius Slyzius wrote:
>
> Hello all.
>
>
>
> I am trying to run ScimoreDB database which uses fibers, non-blocked
> IO for sockets and files, and completion port. It did started ok
> under 0.9.5 and seems it is working!!!:), so I would like to verify
> few things about async IO with completion p
Hello all.
I am trying to run ScimoreDB database which uses fibers, non-blocked IO for
sockets and files, and completion port. It did started ok under 0.9.5 and
seems it is working!!!:), so I would like to verify few things about async
IO with completion ports before recompiling it with winel
