I'm afraid libMyStuff.def is a bit too Unix-like, I *think* it's a lot
more common in the Windows universe to have it called MyStuff.def.
But I don't know exactly if people even know what a .def file is these
days :), and I have little knowledge how folks are naming their .def
files, so ...
On September 28, 2003 05:02 pm, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Not only that, there are also things like register functions etc. But
we should definitely be able to build standard Winelib dlls with a
.def file, this shouldn't be too hard to add.
Glad to hear that, we do need to support it to add
Dimitrie O. Paun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It will probably require
some tweaking of the winebuild command line options though, --spec and
--def are going to be confusing if we also accept .def files as input.
Indeed, maybe we can rename --spec to just --lib (or --implib), as we
are in fact
On September 29, 2003 01:24 am, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
I was thinking we could use --dll, since that's what we are ultimately
building; and it fits well with --exe.
Agreed, --dll is a better choice.
So for this to work (say we have a MyStuff.DLL), I would add
a -lMyStuff, and I'd have
