2011/3/21 Roderick Colenbrander :
> Good :) I guess I should submit the patch as it is now, I hope Henri
> would be fine with doing it this way for the time being (the FBO code
> is doing something equivalent).
Should be ok for the time being.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Konrad Rzepecki
wrote:
> Dnia poniedziałek, 21 marca 2011, Roderick Colenbrander napisał(a):
>> Okay, as I expected no ARB_fragment_program support. Give the attached
>> patch a try. For the time being (hope to get a little bit of time to
>> finish what I started..
Dnia poniedziałek, 21 marca 2011, Roderick Colenbrander napisał(a):
> Okay, as I expected no ARB_fragment_program support. Give the attached
> patch a try. For the time being (hope to get a little bit of time to
> finish what I started..) this patch may be acceptable.
No crash with your patch, so
Okay, as I expected no ARB_fragment_program support. Give the attached
patch a try. For the time being (hope to get a little bit of time to
finish what I started..) this patch may be acceptable.
Roderick
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Konrad Rzepecki
wrote:
> Dnia poniedziałek, 21 marca 2011,
Dnia poniedziałek, 21 marca 2011, napisałeś(aś):
> You should try to figure out why blit_priv is NULL. That's the real
> issue.
I wish to know, where to search. But my patch prevent crash if blit_priv
is NULL form some reason. This is best place I found to fallback to software.
> What drivers a
Hi Konrad,
You should try to figure out why blit_priv is NULL. That's the real
issue. What drivers are you using? Do they support arb fragment
program? Right now we may still call arbfp_blit_surface when the
extension isn't around (was working on this a year ago, haven't had
time since then :( ),
