Ben Klein wrote:
> 2009/6/24 Michael Stefaniuc :
>> Pierre Bourdon wrote:
>>> I think what Michael meant is that
>>> sprintf(a, "%s", b);
>>>
>>> is doing exactly the same thing as
>>> strcpy(a, b);
>> Right, that's what I meant.
>>
>>> in a less efficient way.
>> I'm not that much concerne
2009/6/24 Michael Stefaniuc :
> Pierre Bourdon wrote:
>>
>> I think what Michael meant is that
>> sprintf(a, "%s", b);
>>
>> is doing exactly the same thing as
>> strcpy(a, b);
> Right, that's what I meant.
>
>> in a less efficient way.
> I'm not that much concerned about efficiency as the
Pierre Bourdon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 03:43, Austin English wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
>>> Hello Austin,
>>>
>>> are you reinventing strcpy?
>> We do this elsewhere throughout the source. It prevents possible
>> crashes/security vulnerabilities, as
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Pierre Bourdon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 03:43, Austin English wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
>>> Hello Austin,
>>>
>>> are you reinventing strcpy?
>>
>> We do this elsewhere throughout the source. It prevents possible
>>
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 03:43, Austin English wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
>> Hello Austin,
>>
>> are you reinventing strcpy?
>
> We do this elsewhere throughout the source. It prevents possible
> crashes/security vulnerabilities, as well as this warning:
> arb
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
> Hello Austin,
>
> are you reinventing strcpy?
We do this elsewhere throughout the source. It prevents possible
crashes/security vulnerabilities, as well as this warning:
arb_program_shader.c: In function ‘shader_arb_get_register_name’:
ar
Hello Austin,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:47:18AM -0500, Austin English wrote:
> Okay'ed by Henri
>
are you reinventing strcpy?
> diff --git a/dlls/wined3d/arb_program_shader.c
> b/dlls/wined3d/arb_program_shader.c
> index 44b4fce..f759372 100644
> --- a/dlls/wined3d/arb_program_shader.c
> +++ b
The fix is mostly correct (although obviously there's more wrong with
that code), but please use a slightly more descriptive subject. "Fix a
compiler warning" doesn't say a whole lot.
