Re: [ILLUSTRATOR10] not installable, need to merge 'winedefault.reg'

2004-06-17 Thread Luca Capello
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello, on 06/16/04 18:17, Robert Shearman wrote: > You should run "regsvr32 ole32" instead. You may also need to run > "regsvr32 oleaut32". well, even with these two commands, installation fails (see logs). And the TMP files aren't deleted, as you can

Re: [ILLUSTRATOR10] not installable, need to merge 'winedefault.reg'

2004-06-17 Thread Mike Hearn
On Wed, 16 Jun 2004 17:17:46 +0100, Robert Shearman wrote: > You should run "regsvr32 ole32" instead. You may also need to run > "regsvr32 oleaut32". But, this should be taken care of by wine.inf, and therefore wineprefixcreate which runs it. No? So I guess there's a bug in wine.inf somewhere. We

Re: [ILLUSTRATOR10] not installable, need to merge 'winedefault.reg'

2004-06-16 Thread Robert Shearman
On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 16:32, Luca Capello wrote: > ERROR: You need to merge the 'winedefault.reg' file into your >Wine registry by running: `regedit winedefault.reg' > > fixme:ole:_LocalServerThread CoMarshalInterface failed, 80070057! > > ERROR: You n

[ILLUSTRATOR10] not installable, need to merge 'winedefault.reg'

2004-06-16 Thread Luca Capello
ou need to merge the 'winedefault.reg' file into your Wine registry by running: `regedit winedefault.reg' fixme:ole:_LocalServerThread CoMarshalInterface failed, 80070057! ERROR: You need to merge the 'winedefault.reg' file into your Wine registry by running: `

Re: Nuke winedefault.reg references

2004-05-06 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Vincent Béron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But for now there's some documentation (or messages from Wine at > runtime) which the user cannot follow because winedefault.reg file is > not included anymore. Do you propose to just remove those references > right now and wait u

Re: Nuke winedefault.reg references

2004-05-06 Thread Vincent Béron
Le jeu 06/05/2004 à 20:02, Alexandre Julliard a écrit : > Vincent Béron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Changelog: > > Remove remaining references to winedefault.reg and replace them by > > wine.inf. > > I don't think we want to document the rundll32

Re: Nuke winedefault.reg references

2004-05-06 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Vincent Béron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Changelog: > Remove remaining references to winedefault.reg and replace them by > wine.inf. I don't think we want to document the rundll32 thing; if users have to know about this we are doing something wrong. What we should do is

Re: Replace winedefault.reg with wine.inf in README, README.it and PACKAGING

2004-04-20 Thread Lionel Ulmer
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 09:14:28PM +0200, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote: > As in subject. > License: LGPL * An initial set of registry entries. The current Wine standard is to use the regedit tool against - the 'winedefault.reg' file to generate a default regis

Re: Small winedefault.reg changes

2003-11-18 Thread Alexandre Julliard
Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\AeDebug] > # command line to start a debugger when an exception occurs > -"Debugger"="winedbg --debugmsg -all %ld %ld" > +"Debugger"="winedbg.exe --debugmsg -all %ld %ld" This shouldn'

Re: winedefault.reg

2003-09-09 Thread David . Goodenough
A further problem with the Debian install is that winedefault.reg is delivered packed (.gz). Perhaps as a further addition to regedit (or what ever command line version is to be used) should be to unpack it as well as read it - otherwise please can the Debian version be shipped ungziped. David

Re: winedefault.reg

2003-09-08 Thread Bill Medland
On September 7, 2003 03:49 pm, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote: > Some people on wine-users are complaining that regedit winedefault.reg > doesn' t always work correctly, somebody posted this solution > http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-users/2003/09/0062.html > but it would be a v

Re: winedefault.reg

2003-09-08 Thread Paul McNett
Ivan Leo Murray-Smith writes: > Some people on wine-users are complaining that regedit > winedefault.reg doesn' t always work correctly, somebody > posted this solution > http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-users/2003/09/0062.html > but it would be a very nice thing if reg

winedefault.reg

2003-09-07 Thread Ivan Leo Murray-Smith
Some people on wine-users are complaining that regedit winedefault.reg doesn' t always work correctly, somebody posted this solution http://www.winehq.org/hypermail/wine-users/2003/09/0062.html but it would be a very nice thing if regedit winedefault.reg exited with no output and just worked